...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical reviews in bone and mineral metabolism >Clinical Measurements of Bone Tissue Mechanical Behavior Using Reference Point Indentation
【24h】

Clinical Measurements of Bone Tissue Mechanical Behavior Using Reference Point Indentation

机译:使用参考点压痕的骨组织机械行为的临床测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the last 30 years, it has become increasingly clear the amount of bone (e.g., "bone quantity") and the quality of the bone matrix (e.g., Bbone quality") both critically contribute to bone's tissue-level mechanical behavior and the subsequent ability of bone to resist fracture. Although determining the tissue-level mechanical behavior of bone through mechanical testing is relatively straightforward in the laboratory, the destructive nature of such testing is unfeasible in humans and in animal models requiring longitudinal observation. Therefore, surrogate measurements are necessary for quantifying tissue-level mechanical behavior for the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of bone strength and fracture risk in vivo. A specific implementation of indentation known as reference point indentation (RPI) enables the mechanical testing of bone tissue without the need to excise and prepare the bone surface. However, this compromises the ability to carefully control the specimen geometry that is required to define the bone tissue material properties. Yet, the versatility of such measurements in clinical populations is provocative, and to date, there are a number of promising studies that have utilized this tool to discern bone pathologies and to monitor the effects of therapeutics on bone quality. Concurrently, ongoing efforts continue to investigate the aspects of bone material behavior measured by RPI and the compositional factors that contribute to these measurements. There are currently two variants, cyclic- and impact-RPI, that have been utilized in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review surveys clinical studies that utilize RPI, with particular emphasis on the clinical instrument, as well as the endeavors to understand the fundamental mechanisms of such measurements. Ultimately, an improved awareness in the tradeoffs and limitations of in vivo RPI is critical towards the effective and successful utilization of this tool for the overall improvement of fragility determination in the clinic.
机译:在过去的30年中,它已经越来越清楚了骨骼量(例如,“骨量”)和骨基质的质量(例如,BBONE质量“)既严重导致骨骼组织级机械行为和随后的骨骼能力抵抗骨折。虽然通过机械测试确定骨的组织级机械行为在实验室中相对简单,但这种测试的破坏性在人类和需要纵向观察的动物模型中是不可行的。因此,替代测量是定量组织级机械行为所必需的临床临床和临床评价体内骨骼强度和骨折风险。称为参考点压痕(RPI)的凹痕的具体实施使得骨组织的机械测试而不需要开除并准备骨表面。然而,这损害了仔细控制样品几何T的能力帽子是确定骨组织材料的性质。然而,临床群体中这种测量的多功能性是挑衅性的,并且迄今为止,存在许多有希望的研究,这些研究已经利用该工具辨别骨质病理,并监测治疗剂对骨质质量的影响。同时,持续的努力继续探讨通过RPI测量的骨材料行为的方面和有助于这些测量的组成因子。目前有两种变体,环循环和抗冲击RPI,其已在临床前和临床研究中使用。本综述调查临床研究,利用RPI,特别强调临床仪器,以及了解此类测量的基本机制的努力。最终,在体内RPI的权衡和局限性的提高意识至关重要,迈为该工具的有效和成功利用临床脆弱性测定的整体改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号