首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation
【2h】

Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation

机译:使用参考点压痕的骨组织力学行为的临床测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Over the last thirty years, it has become increasingly clear the amount of bone (e.g. ‘bone quantity’) and the quality of the bone matrix (e.g. ‘bone quality’) both critically contribute to bone’s tissue-level mechanical behavior and the subsequent ability of bone to resist fracture. Although determining the tissue-level mechanical behavior of bone through mechanical testing is relatively straightforward in the laboratory, the destructive nature of such testing is unfeasible in humans and in animal models requiring longitudinal observation. Therefore, surrogate measurements are necessary for quantifying tissue-level mechanical behavior for the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of bone strength and fracture risk in vivo.A specific implementation of indentation known as reference point indentation (RPI) enables the mechanical testing of bone tissue without the need to excise and prepare the bone surface. However, this compromises the ability to carefully control the specimen geometry that is required to define the bone tissue material properties. Yet the versatility of such measurements in clinical populations is provocative, and to date there are a number of promising studies that have utilized this tool to discern bone pathologies and to monitor the effects of therapeutics on bone quality. Concurrently, on-going efforts continue to investigate the aspects of bone material behavior measured by RPI, and the compositional factors that contribute to these measurements. There are currently two variants, cyclic- and impact- RPI, that have been utilized in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review surveys clinical studies that utilize RPI, with particular emphasis on the clinical instrument, as well as the endeavors to understand the fundamental mechanisms of such measurements. Ultimately, an improved awareness in the tradeoffs and limitations of in vivo RPI is critical towards the effective and successful utilization of this tool for the overall improvement of fragility determination in the clinic.
机译:在过去的三十年中,越来越清楚的是骨骼的数量(例如“骨骼数量”)和骨骼基质的质量(例如“骨骼质量”)都对骨骼的组织水平的机械行为和随后的能力至关重要。抵抗骨折。尽管在实验室中通过机械测试确定骨骼的组织水平机械行为相对简单,但是这种测试的破坏性在人类和需要纵向观察的动物模型中是不可行的。因此,需要进行替代性测量以量化组织水平的机械行为,以进行临床前和临床上的体内骨强度和骨折风险评估。压痕的一种特定实现方式称为参考点压痕(RPI),可以对骨组织进行机械测试无需切除和准备骨表面。然而,这损害了仔细控制定义骨组织材料特性所需的样本几何形状的能力。然而,此类测量在临床人群中的多功能性令人鼓舞,并且迄今为止,有许多有前途的研究已经利用该工具来辨别骨骼病变并监测治疗剂对骨骼质量的影响。同时,正在进行的工作继续研究通过RPI测量的骨材料行为的各个方面,以及有助于这些测量的组成因素。目前,在临床前和临床研究中使用了两种变体,即循环和影响RPI。这篇综述调查了利用RPI的临床研究,尤其侧重于临床仪器,以及努力了解此类测量的基本机制。最终,提高对体内RPI的权衡和局限性的认识对于有效,成功地利用此工具来全面改善临床中的脆性测定至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号