首页> 外文期刊>Clinical transplantation. >Results in liver transplantation using grafts from donors after controlled circulatory death: A single‐center experience comparing donor grafts harvested after controlled circulatory death to those harvested after brain death
【24h】

Results in liver transplantation using grafts from donors after controlled circulatory death: A single‐center experience comparing donor grafts harvested after controlled circulatory death to those harvested after brain death

机译:结果在受控循环死亡之后使用来自供体的移植物的肝移植:单中心经验比较在受控循环死亡后收获的供体移植到脑死后收获的那些

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background In recent years, interest in donation after cardiac death (DCD) has increased. Although DCD liver transplantation (LT) has demonstrated satisfactory long‐term outcomes, different studies have shown poorer patient and graft survival after DCD than after donation after brain death (DBD). This study aimed to evaluate the results of LT using controlled DCD (cDCD) donors, specifically the incidence of primary non‐function and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), and to compare these results with those of LT using DBD in the same time period. Methods Between June 2012 and July 2018, we performed 66 transplants using cDCD and 258 with DBD grafts. Results The incidence of IC was similar in both groups (2% in DBD, 1.5% in DCD; P ?=?.999). No significant differences were found for overall graft and patient survival rates between the groups at 1 and 2?years post‐transplantation. Conclusions This study provided evidence that cDCD donors exhibit excellent graft and patient survival outcomes. When the warm ischemia time is 30?minutes and cold ischemia time is 6?hours, the graft and patient survival rates and the incidence of IC in DCD are similar to those in DBD, even when using donors without age restrictions.
机译:近年来的抽象背景,心脏病死后捐赠的兴趣(DCD)增加。虽然DCD肝移植(LT)已经证明了令人满意的长期结果,但不同的研究表明DCD后的患者和移植物存活率比脑死亡(DBD)后捐赠后较较差的患者和移植物存活。本研究旨在评估使用受控DCD(CDCD)供体的LT的结果,特别是初级非功能和缺血性胆管病变(IC)的发生率,并在同一时间段内使用DBD与LT的那些结果进行比较。方法2012年6月至2018年7月,我们使用CDCD和258进行了66次移植,DBD移植物。结果两组IC的发生率相似(DBD中2%,DCD中的1.5%; P?= 999)。在移植后1和2年之间的群体之间的整体移植物和患者存活率没有显着差异。结论本研究规定了CDCD供体表现出优异的移植物和患者存活结果。当温暖的缺血时间是& 30?分钟和冷缺血时间是& 6?小时,即使在没有年龄限制的情况下使用捐赠者,DCD中的移植物和患者存活率和IC的IC的发生率也类似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号