首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Growing greenhouse tomato and sweet pepper under supplemental lighting: Optimal photoperiod, negative effects of long photoperiod and their causes
【24h】

Growing greenhouse tomato and sweet pepper under supplemental lighting: Optimal photoperiod, negative effects of long photoperiod and their causes

机译:在辅助照明下种植温室番茄和甜椒:最佳光周期,长光周期的负面影响及其原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reviews the available information on the photoperiod aspects of the use of supplemental lighting for greenhouse tomato and sweet pepper production. Optimal growth and yields of tomato and sweet pepper were obtained under photoperiods of 14 and 20 hours, respectively. Longer photoperiods did not further improve growth and yields and even decreased growth and yields in some cases. Although long term use of continuous light is detrimental to tomato and pepper plants, vegetative growth and fruit production of both species can be improved by short term use (5 to 7 weeks) of continuous lighting. Compared to shorter photoperiods, continuous light (24-h photoperiod) increased the leaf levels of hexoses in tomato, of sucrose in pepper and of starch in both species. The accumulation of starch and sugar in leaves under continuous light indicate a limitation of tomato and pepper plants to export the photosynthate out of their leaves. Such a limitation would explain the fact that extra light energy provided by continuous lighting did not result into growth and yield gains. The increased leaf hexose levels in tomato and increased leaf sucrose in pepper suggest that the limiting steps of the export of photosynthate are respectively the synthesis of sucrose and the loading of sucrose in the phloem. Under greenhouse conditions, continuous light caused leaf chlorosis in tomato but not in sweet pepper. Development of leaf chlorosis in tomato under continuous light was related to a decrease of the chlorophyll concentration in the leaves. Compared to tomato, higher levels of carotene and xanthophylls (photoprotective pigments) in pepper leaves probably provided a better protection of the photosynthetic apparatus against excessive light, thus preventing the destruction of chlorophylls and the development of leaf chlorosis in pepper. The severity of leaf chlorosis varied with the type of lamps (high pressure sodium, HPS versus metal halide, MH) used to provide the supplemental light, indicating that the spectral composition of the light received by plants may also play a role in the development of leaf chlorosis. Under continuous light, the response of tomato and pepper plants to HPS lamps versus MH in the greenhouse differed from the response in growth chambers. These differences between greenhouse and growth chamber could be related to the light spectral quality (presence or absence of natural light) and/or the daily variation in the climatic conditions (larger dayight differential in greenhouse).
机译:本文回顾了在温室番茄和甜椒生产中使用补充照明的光周期方面的可用信息。分别在14和20小时的光周期下,番茄和甜椒的最佳生长和产量。在某些情况下,较长的光周期不能进一步改善生长和产量,甚至不能降低生长和产量。尽管长期使用连续光不利于番茄和辣椒植物,但短期使用连续照明(5至7周)可以改善两种植物的营养生长和水果产量。与较短的光周期相比,连续光照(24小时光周期)增加了番茄中己糖,胡椒中蔗糖和两种淀粉中淀粉的叶水平。在连续光照下,叶片中淀粉和糖的积累表明番茄和辣椒植物无法从叶片中输出光合产物。这样的限制可以解释这样一个事实,即连续照明提供的额外光能不会导致生长和产量增加。番茄叶片中己糖含量的增加和胡椒中叶片中蔗糖含量的增加表明,光合产物输出的限制步骤分别是蔗糖的合成和韧皮部蔗糖的负载。在温室条件下,持续的光照会导致番茄叶绿化,而甜椒则不会。连续光照下番茄叶片叶绿化的发展与叶片中叶绿素浓度的降低有关。与番茄相比,辣椒叶中较高水平的胡萝卜素和叶黄素(光防护色素)可能为光合装置提供了更好的保护,使其免受过度光照,从而防止了叶绿素的破坏和辣椒中叶绿化的发展。叶绿化的严重程度随用于提供补充光的灯的类型(高压钠灯,HPS与金属卤化物,MH)的不同而不同,这表明植物接收到的光的光谱成分也可能在植物的发育中起作用。叶萎黄。在连续光照下,番茄和辣椒植物对温室中HPS灯对MH的响应与在生长室中的响应不同。温室和生长室之间的这些差异可能与光谱质量(存在或不存在自然光)和/或气候条件的每日变化(温室中日夜差异较大)有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号