...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical biomechanics >Bone grafting in oblique versus prepared rectangular uncontained glenoid defects in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. A biomechanical comparison
【24h】

Bone grafting in oblique versus prepared rectangular uncontained glenoid defects in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. A biomechanical comparison

机译:斜骨嫁接与倒肩关节置换术中的矩形无孔无孔缺陷。 生物力学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Background How the shape of the glenoid defect being reconstructed influences stability in reversed shoulder arthroplasty has never been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the reconstruction of two different shaped defects in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Methods Two groups (ten Sawbone scapulae each) of oblique- and rectangular-shaped glenoid defects were tested biomechanically. On the anterior half of the glenoid, bony defects (rectangular and oblique shaped) were prepared and reconstructed subsequently with a graft and reversed shoulder arthroplasty. As a control group, Sawbones without glenoid deficiency were used. In addition, these tests were reproduced in cadavers. Findings In Sawbones, no significant difference in initial stability was found between the two groups ( p >0.05). Additionally, in the cadaver tests no significant difference was found between the groups with different defects ( p >0.05). During the preparation, macroscopic loosening of the oblique bone grafts was found in three cases after the performance of the reversed shoulder arthroplasty due to the lack of medial support. The localization of the highest micromotion were measured primarily between the scapula bone and the graft compared to the measured micromotions between glenoid implant and the graft. Interpretation If the oblique-shaped bone graft was secured under the baseplate, the rectangular defect preparation did not show a significantly higher primary stability. However, the advantage of medial support in rectangular defects leads to more stability while placing the bone graft and baseplate during the surgical technique and should therefore be considered a preferable option. Highlights ? No difference in micromotion between rectangular and oblique-shaped defect reconstructions. ? Rectangular graft leads to higher stability while defect preparation. ? The highest micromotion is located primarily between the scapula bone and the graft.
机译:摘要背景如何重建关节缺陷的形状,从未评估过逆肩关节置换术中的稳定性。本研究的目的是比较反转肩部透析术中两种不同形状缺陷的重建。方法在生物力学上测试两组(每次锯齿状肩胛骨)倾斜和矩形胶质缺陷。在面部的前一半,随后用移植物和逆转肩部成形术治疗并重建骨缺陷(矩形和倾斜形)。作为对照组,使用没有眼盂缺乏症的锯片。此外,这些测试在尸体中转载。在锯骨中发现,两组之间没有发现初始稳定性的显着差异(P> 0.05)。另外,在尸体试验中,在具有不同缺陷的组之间没有发现显着差异(P> 0.05)。在制备过程中,在倒肩关节置换术后的三种情况下发现了倾斜骨移植物的宏观放松,由于缺乏内侧载体。与顶盖植入物和移植物之间的测量的微调相比,主要在肩胛骨和移植物之间测量最高微调的定位。解释如果在底板下固定倾斜形骨移植物,则矩形缺陷制剂没有显示出显着较高的初级稳定性。然而,在矩形缺陷中,内侧支撑的优点导致在手术技术期间放置骨移植物和底板的同时导致更稳定的稳定性,因此应该被认为是优选的选择。强调 ?矩形和倾斜形状缺陷重建之间的微观差异。还矩形移植物导致较高的稳定性,同时缺陷制备。还最高的微量镜主要位于肩胛骨骨和移植物之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号