首页> 外文会议>International Conference on the Development of Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam >Biomechanical Comparison of Conventional Technique Versus Oblique Screw Placement Under Axial arid Torsional Loading—An In Vitro Study of Humerus Bone Surrogate
【24h】

Biomechanical Comparison of Conventional Technique Versus Oblique Screw Placement Under Axial arid Torsional Loading—An In Vitro Study of Humerus Bone Surrogate

机译:常规技术的生物力学比较与轴向干旱扭转载荷下的斜螺杆放置 - 肱骨骨替代的体外研究

获取原文

摘要

The study specifically aims to investigate a novel method to increase strength of bone plate and screw system fixation in orthopedic surgery via placing screws at an angle rather than in a transverse direction as in the conventional technique. Biomechanical tests were performed in axial compression and torsion for humeral bone fixation construct using a bone plate and screws system. Fifteen humeral surrogate bone models were utilized to have 3 groups (N - 5). Humerus bone with a simulated 6 mm fracture gap at midshaft was fixated with a 4.5 mm dynamic compression plate and six bi-cortical screws. Three fixation configurations, which were different by the number of oblique screws, were employed. In the control group (C), there was none oblique screw. The single oblique (SO) group had one oblique screw at each end of the plate. The double oblique (DO) group has two oblique screws. All oblique screws were inserted at 30° angle with respect to transverse plane. All groups were tested under axial and torsional loads in a non-destructive cyclic test prior to destructive test. One-way ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences between the group means with 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05). None of the sample failed the 10,000-cycle fatigue test. The axial stiffness of group SO and DO were superior to that of group C (556.4 ± 52.4, 655.3 ± 24.6, and 632.1 ± 70.2 N/mm (p = 0.05) for group C, SO, and DO respectively). The values for yield load and ultimate load were also reported, but they were not significantly different. The post-cyclic torsional stiffness of group C, SO and DO were 0.59 ± 0.01, 0.62 ± 0.02, and 0.63 ± 0.03 Nm/° (p < 0.05). In summary, the oblique screw placement increased the axial stability of the bone construct while it did not alter significantly the torsional stability. When compared between SO and DO groups, test values were relatively equivalent. Using two consecutive oblique screws was not proven to be more effective than using one oblique screw at plate end.
机译:该研究特别旨在调查的新颖的方法以一定的角度,而不是在横向方向上为在常规技术中通过把螺钉,以增加骨板和在矫形外科螺钉系统固定强度。使用骨板和螺钉系统在轴向压缩和扭转旋转中进行生物力学试验。利用十五个肱骨替代骨模型进行3组(N - 5)。肱骨模拟的6mm骨折间隙在中间骨折用4.5mm动态压缩板和六个双皮质螺钉固定。采用三种固定配置,其不同的斜螺钉的数量不同。在对照组(C)中,没有斜螺钉。单个斜(SO)组在板的每个端部有一个倾斜螺钉。双斜(DO)组有两个斜螺钉。相对于横向平面,将所有斜螺钉以30°角插入。在破坏性测试之前,在非破坏性循环试验中在轴向和扭转载量下进行所有基团。单向ANOVA测试用于检测组分之间的显着差异,具有95%置信区间(P <0.05)。没有一个样品未能失败10,000周期疲劳测试。组的轴刚度和确实优于C组(556.4±52.4,655.3±24.6和632.1±70.2n / mm(p = 0.05),分别为C组,SO和DO。还报道了屈服负荷和最终负荷的值,但它们没有显着差异。 C组的循环扭转刚度,所以和确实为0.59±0.01,0.62±0.02和0.63±0.03nm /°(P <0.05)。总之,倾斜螺杆放置增加了骨构造的轴向稳定性,同时它没有显着改变扭转稳定性。在这样和执行组之间比较时,测试值相对等同。使用两个连续的倾斜螺钉未被证明比在板端的一个斜螺钉更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号