首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie >Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre: a quest for perfection
【24h】

Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre: a quest for perfection

机译:在1级加拿大创伤中心穿透腹腔创伤的选择性非手术管理:寻求完美

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many patients who sustain penetrating abdominal trauma can be managed nonoperatively. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines on selective nonoperative management (SNOM), and this approach is well established. The purpose of this study is to assess the management of penetrating abdominal trauma, including the selection of patients for SNOM and the use of this approach, at a Canadian level 1 trauma centre. We used the Hamilton Health Sciences trauma registry to compile data on patients aged 16 years and older who sustained penetrating abdominal trauma from Jan. 1, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2017. Hemodynamically stable, nonperitonitic patients without evisceration or impalement were considered potentially eligible for SNOM. We compared the SNOM group of patients with the immediate operative (IOR) group. Our primary outcome was SNOM failure; secondary outcomes included length of stay, repeat imaging, computed tomography (CT) protocol, laparoscopy in left thoracoabdominal trauma, and nontherapeutic and negative laparotomies. We included 191 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma; 123 underwent SNOM and 68 underwent IOR. Of the 68 patients in the IOR group, 4 underwent nontherapeutic laparotomies. Of the 123 patients in the SNOM group, this approach failed in 7 (5.7%). Patients who were successfully managed with SNOM had an average length of stay of 25.4 hours (7.9–43.0 h), with no repeat imaging in 34/35 (97.1%). Only 5 of the 47 patients with flank/back wounds had a CT scan that included luminal contrast. Only 3 of the 58 patients with left thoracoabdominal wounds underwent same-admission laparoscopy, all demonstrating diaphragmatic defects. Our study demonstrates a high rate of compliance with the EAST SNOM guidelines, including minimal failure rate of SNOM and an efficient use of resources as demonstrated by reduced length of stay and minimal use of reimaging. We identified 2 opportunities for improvement: improved use of luminal contrast CT in patients with flank/back wounds and improved use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with left thoracoabdominal wounds.
机译:许多维持渗透腹腔创伤的患者可以非手术管理。东方对创伤(东部)手术协会发表了有关选择性非手术管理(SNOM)的指导方针,这一方法得到了很好的成熟。本研究的目的是评估穿透腹腔创伤的管理,包括选择患者的SNOM和使用这种方法,在加拿大1级创伤中心。我们使用Hamilton Health Scies Trauma Registry编制了从2011年1月1日到2017年12月1日持续穿透腹腔创伤的患者的患者数据。血流动力学稳定,没有剔除或滥用的非植物患者被认为是可能符合条件的对于SnOM。我们将患者的SNOM组比较了直接手术(IOR)组。我们的主要结果是Snom失败;二次结果包括保持长度,重复成像,计算机断层扫描(CT)方案,左胸腹腔创伤的腹腔镜检查,无菌和阴性腹腔切开术。我们包括191例腹腔创伤患者; 123接受SNOM和68次接受过iOR。 IOR组68名患者中,4例未进行的无菌腹膜切开术。在SNOM组的123名患者中,这种方法在7(5.7%)中失败了。用SNOM成功管理的患者平均入住时间为25.4小时(7.9-43.0小时),在34/35中没有重复成像(97.1%)。 47例侧面/后伤伤患者中只有5个具有CT扫描,包括腔对比度。 58例左胸腹腔伤口中只有3名患者患有相同的腹腔镜检查,均展示膈肌缺陷。我们的研究表明,高度符合东部SNOM指南,包括SNOM的最小失败率,以及通过减少保持长度和纪念使用最小使用的资源有效使用资源。我们确定了2种改进机会:改善了侧翼/背部伤口患者的腔对比度CT的使用,并改善了左胸腹腔伤口患者的诊断腹腔镜检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号