...
首页> 外文期刊>Child & family social work >Who returns home? Study on placement outcomes of Flemish foster children
【24h】

Who returns home? Study on placement outcomes of Flemish foster children

机译:谁回家? 佛兰芒寄养儿童的安置成果研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Until recently, Flemish family foster care was a temporary measure with as its most important goal, the reunification of the foster child with the birth parents. To date, nothing is known on the number of reunifications, nor has any study been undertaken into the factors (child, parent, foster parent and foster care process) associated with reunification. Case files of 127 foster children who exited foster care in 2007 were analysed. Dependent variables were type of foster care placement outcome (reunification, successful placement without reunification or breakdown) and place of residence after placement ending (with birth parents, extended family, foster family, residential care or living independently). After placement ending, only 40% of foster children went living with their parents, including foster children who were reunified (26%) and foster children who moved to their parents after a placement breakdown (14%). Characteristics of the foster children, and in particular absence of problem behaviour, were associated mainly with a return home. This may indicate that too much attention is paid to the functioning of the foster child and too little to improving the competencies of the parents and the (future) home environment.
机译:直到最近,佛兰芒家庭寄养是一种临时措施,作为其最重要的目标,培养孩子与生育父母的统一。迄今为止,没有任何内容在一起的统一次数,也没有任何研究进入与统一相关的因素(儿童,父母,养父母和寄养过程)。分析了2007年寄养的127份培养儿童的案例文件。受抚养变量是寄养置入结果(统一,未经统一或崩溃的统一)和居住地的居住地(与出生父母,大家庭,寄养家庭,住宅护理或独立生活)。放置结束后,只有40%的寄养儿童与父母一起生活,包括寄养的儿童统一(26%),并在放置故障后搬到父母的儿童(14%)。培养儿童的特征,特别是缺乏问题行为,主要与回家有关。这可能表明,对培养儿童的运作来说,太多的关注以及改善父母和(未来)家庭环境的能力太少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号