首页> 外文期刊>Child & family social work >Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: the experiences of a group of child care social workers in England
【24h】

Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: the experiences of a group of child care social workers in England

机译:修辞与社会工作监督的现实:英格兰一群幼儿社会工作者的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Whilst the contribution of good supervision to high-quality social work practice is widely recognized, research exploring practitioners' experiences of supervision is surprisingly limited. Set within the context of the supervision framework for employers of social workers in England, this small-scale survey, using an extended questionnaire, examined the experiences of supervision of a group of child care social workers. The aim was to find out what aspects of supervision worked well and where there was room for improvement. The findings suggest that whilst the majority of employers had appropriate supervision policies in place, day-to-day practice varied enormously, frequently falling well short of national standards, with the quality of supervision often depending more on the characteristics of the supervisor and the agency context than the needs of the worker. Supervision sessions typically focused predominantly on case management, with much less attention paid to the worker and opportunities for them to reflect on their practice. Only a quarter of the social workers in this survey could be considered to be satisfied with their current supervision, with a much higher proportion clearly dissatisfied.
机译:虽然良好监督对高质量的社会工作实践的贡献得到了广泛认识,但研究探索从业者的监督经验令人惊讶地限制。在英格兰社会工作人员雇主的监督框架内,这种小型调查使用扩展问卷调查审查了一群儿童护理社会工作者的监督经验。目的是找出监督的哪些方面良好,并且有改进的空间。调查结果表明,虽然大多数雇主都有适当的监督政策,但日常惯例变得极大,往往缺乏国家标准,往往的监督质量往往取决于监督员和原子能机构的特征上下文比工人的需求。监管会议通常主要集中在案例管理上,对工作人员和机会的关注程度不那么关注,以反思其实践。在本调查中只有四分之一的社会工作者可以被认为对他们目前的监督满意,具有更高的比例明显不满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号