...
首页> 外文期刊>Child psychiatry and human development >Experience Versus Report: Where Are Changes Seen After Exposure-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy? A Randomized Controlled Group Treatment of Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder
【24h】

Experience Versus Report: Where Are Changes Seen After Exposure-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy? A Randomized Controlled Group Treatment of Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder

机译:经验与报告:在曝光的曝光的认知行为治疗后,在哪里可以看到? 儿童社交焦虑症的随机对照组治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A considerable number of children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder (SAD) do not benefit from treatment as much as expected. However, treatment success should not be measured with social anxiety reports alone; the cognitive, behavioral, and physiological components of social stress should also be assessed. The authors examined an exposure-based SAD-specific group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a randomized controlled trial (N = 67, age 9-13 years, blind randomized allocation to treatment [CBT; n = 31] and waitlist control [WLC; n = 36] groups). Success was operationalized as a clinically significant reduction of symptoms measured with SAD-specific questionnaires, structured interviews, and changes in response to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). In the CBT group, there was a trend toward a significant increase in positive cognitions in the TSST after treatment (d = 0.37), whereas these positive cognitions decreased in the WLC group (d = 0.40). No significant results involving group appeared for negative cognitions, behavior and physiology. Children in the CBT group, but not parents, further reported less social anxiety in one questionnaire from pre- to post-treatment (d = 0.89). A structured interview confirmed a decrease in severity of SAD in the CBT group. While the gold standard of a blind interview showed efficacy of treatment, not all trait and state measures demonstrated similar success patterns. Trial registration Eligibility criteria and some of the dependent variables (cognitions, physiology) for treatment success were registered with the German Research Foundation (TU 78/5-2, HE 3342/4-2) prior to recruitment. Clinical assessment of diagnosis and behavioral data were not a priori planned as outcome measures for this trial and therefore analyzed in a post-hoc approach.
机译:具有社交焦虑症(悲伤)的相当数量的儿童和青少年不会从预期的那样受益于治疗。但是,不应单独使用社交焦虑报告来衡量治疗成功;还应评估社会压力的认知,行为和生理成分。作者在随机对照试验中检查了一种基于暴露的悲伤特异性组认知行为治疗(CBT)(n = 67,9-13岁,盲目随机分配给治疗[CBT; n = 31]和候补人员控制[WLC ; n = 36]组)。成功是在临床上显着减少患有悲伤特定调查问卷的症状,结构化访谈和响应Thrier社会压力测试(TSST)的变化。在CBT组中,在治疗后TSST中的阳性认知呈显着增加趋势(D = 0.37),而这些阳性认知在WLC组中减少(D = 0.40)。涉及集团的综合结果出现为负认知,行为和生理学。 CBT集团的儿童,但不是父母,进一步报告了一个调查问卷中的社会焦虑,从治疗后(D = 0.89)。结构化面试证实了CBT集团在悲伤的严重程度下降。虽然盲人面试的黄金标准表现出治疗的疗效,但并非所有特质和国家措施都表现出类似的成功模式。审判登记资格标准和一些依赖变量(认知,生理学)在招聘前以德国研究基金会(TU 78 / 5-2,HE 3342 / 4-2)注册。诊断和行为数据的临床评估并不是计划作为该试验的结果措施的先验,并因此以后行为的方法分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号