首页> 外文期刊>Child neuropsychology: a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence >Brief report: Relationship between performance testing and parent report of attention and executive functioning profiles in children following perinatal arterial ischemic stroke
【24h】

Brief report: Relationship between performance testing and parent report of attention and executive functioning profiles in children following perinatal arterial ischemic stroke

机译:简要介绍:围产病动脉缺血性卒中后绩效测试与父母报告与父母报告的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Children with perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) have increased rates of attention and executive functioning (EF) weaknesses. Research in other pediatric disorders has documented poor consistency between parent report of these skills and performance-based measures. We compared these data sources in children with PAIS. Forty full-term (>= 37 weeks) children ages 3-16 (median = 7.2 years; 58% male) with PAIS completed neuropsychological testing and composite scores were created for seven attention and EF domains (Processing Speed; Attention; Working Memory; Verbal Retrieval; Inhibitory Control; Flexibility/Shifting; Planning). Parents completed "real-world" functioning questionnaires (ADHD Rating Scale-IV, BRIEF). Correlational analysis were used to compare parent and performance measures. Correlations between ADHD Rating Scale-IV scores and the performance-based Attention and Inhibition composite scores were nonsignificant. Significant negative correlations were found between the BRIEF GEC and performance-based Verbal Retrieval and Processing Speed composites, but remaining GEC/composite comparisons were nonsignificant. Analyses between parent report BRIEF index scores and the corresponding performance-based domain identified one significant negative correlation between the BRIEF Working Memory Index and the Working Memory composite score. While children with PAIS demonstrate difficulties in attention and EF on both parent report and performance measures, little significance was found in comparisons of these two types of measures. There may be several explanations for this dissociation: measures assessing different aspects of the same underlying construct; performance-based measures lacking ecological validity; and parents underestimating/underreporting their child's deficits. Thus, multiple sources of informant and performance data are necessary to make more accurate conclusions about functioning in these domains.
机译:围产期动脉缺血性卒中(PAI)的儿童提高了关注率和执行功能(EF)弱点。其他儿科疾病的研究在母公司的母公司的父母报告与基于绩效的措施之间有不良一致性。我们将这些数据来源与PAI的儿童进行了比较。 4-16岁儿童(> = 37周),3-16岁(中位数= 7.2岁; 58%男性)与PAI完成的神经心理学检测和复合分数是为七个关注和EF结构域(加工速度;注意;工作记忆;口头检索;抑制控制;灵活性/移位;规划)。父母完成了“现实世界”的正常调查问卷(ADHD评级规模 - IV,简短)。相关分析用于比较父母和绩效措施。 ADHD评级规模-4V分数与基于性能的关注和抑制​​复合分数之间的相关性是不显着的。在简短的GEC和基于性能的口头检索和处理速度复合之间发现了显着的负相关,但剩余的GEC /综合比较是不可取重要的。父报告之间的分析简要索引分数和相应的基于性能的域确定了简短的工作存储器索引和工作存储器综合评分之间的一个显着的负相关。虽然PAI的儿童在母公司报告和绩效措施中表现出关注和EF的困难,但在这两种措施的比较中发现了几乎没有意义。对此解离可能有几个解释:评估同一底层结构的不同方面的措施;基于性能的措施缺乏生态有效性;和父母低估/疏忽他们孩子的赤字。因此,需要多种信息和性能数据来在这些域中进行更准确的结论所必需的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号