首页> 外文期刊>Acta Haematologica >Cross-talk between available guidelines for the management of patients with beta-thalassemia major
【24h】

Cross-talk between available guidelines for the management of patients with beta-thalassemia major

机译:严重β-地中海贫血患者管理指南之间的相互影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Efforts to optimize the management of patients with β-thalassemia major (TM) continue to expand. Evidence from biomedical research evaluating safe and careful processing measures of blood products, the efficacy and safety of oral iron chelators, and noninvasive techniques for the assessment of iron overload are translated into better patient outcomes. The construction of TM management guidelines facilitated the incorporation of such evidence into practice. However, as several aspects of the management of TM remain controversial or governed by resource availability, a concern regarding potential variations in recommendations made by the different guidelines becomes rational, especially for physicians treating TM patients outside countries where the guidelines were constructed. In this work, we overview currently available guidelines for the management of TM and explore apparent similarities and differences between them. The evaluated guidelines included the Thalassaemia International Federation, US, Canadian, UK, Italian and Australian guidelines. We noted a general consensus for most aspects of management, although some guidelines provided more comprehensive and contemporary recommendations than others. We did not identify differences warranting concern, although minor differences in iron overload assessment strategy and more notable variations in the recommendations for iron chelation therapy were observed.
机译:优化重度β地中海贫血(TM)患者管理的工作仍在继续。生物医学研究评估血液制品的安全和谨慎处理措施,口服铁螯合剂的功效和安全性以及用于评估铁超负荷的非侵入性技术的证据被转化为更好的患者预后。 TM管理指南的构建促进了将此类证据纳入实践。但是,由于TM管理的几个方面仍然存在争议或受资源可用性的支配,因此对由不同指南提出的建议可能存在的变化的担忧变得合理,尤其是对于在制定指南的国家以外治疗TM患者的医生而言。在这项工作中,我们概述了TM管理的当前可用指南,并探讨了它们之间明显的相似之处和不同之处。评估的指南包括地中海贫血国际联合会,美国,加拿大,英国,意大利和澳大利亚的指南。我们注意到在管理的大多数方面达成了普遍共识,尽管某些指南比其他指南提供了更全面和最新的建议。我们并未发现值得关注的差异,尽管观察到铁超负荷评估策略存在细微差异,并且铁螯合疗法的建议存在更显着的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号