首页> 外文期刊>Chemical research in toxicology >21st Century Cell Culture for 21st Century Toxicology
【24h】

21st Century Cell Culture for 21st Century Toxicology

机译:21世纪的21世纪细胞培养物毒理学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is no good science in bad models. Cell culture is especially prone to artifacts. A number of novel cell culture technologies have become more broadly available in the 21st century, which allow overcoming limitations of traditional culture and are more physiologically relevant. These include the use of stem-cell derived human cells, cocultures of different cell types, scaffolds and extracellular matrices, perfusion platforms (such as microfluidics), 3D culture, organ-On-chip technologies, tissue architecture, and organ functionality. The physiological relevance of such models is fUrther enhanced by the measurement of biomarkers (e.g., key events of pathways), organ specific functionality, and more comprehensive assessment cell responses by high-content methods. These approaches are still rarely combined to create microphysiological sygtems. The complexity of the combination of these technologies can generate results closer to the in vivo situation but increases the number of parameters to control, bringing some new challenges. In fact, we do not argue that all cell culture needs to be that sophisticated. The efforts taken are determined by the purpose of our experiments and tests. If only a very specific molecular target to cell response is of interest, a very simple model, which reflects this, might be much more suited to allow standardization and high-throughput. However, the less defined the end point of interest and cellular response are, the better we should approximate organ- or tissue-like culture conditions to make physiological responses more probable. Besides these technologic advances, important progress in the quality assurance and reporting on cell cultures as well as the validation of cellular test systems brings the utility of cell cultures to a new level. The advancement and broader implementation of Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP) is key here. In toxicology, this is a major prerequisite for meaningful and reliable results, ultimately supporting risk assessment and product development decisions.
机译:在不良模型中没有好的科学。细胞培养尤其容易发生伪影。在21世纪,许多新颖的细胞培养技术在21世纪变得更广泛地提供,这允许克服传统文化的局限性,并且更为生理相关。这些包括使用茎细胞衍生的人体细胞,不同细胞类型,支架和细胞外基质的共培养,灌注平台(如微流体),3D培养,片上技术,组织架构和器官功能。通过测量生物标志物(例如,途径的关键事件),器官特定功能,更全面的评估细胞应对通过高含量方法,进一步增强了这种模型的生理学意义。这些方法仍然很少结合以创造微生物学单演。这些技术组合的复杂性可以产生更接近体内情况的结果,但增加了控制的参数数量,带来了一些新的挑战。事实上,我们并不认为所有细胞文化都需要成为复杂的。所采取的努力是通过我们的实验和测试的目的决定。如果仅对细胞响应的一个非常特异性的分子靶标感兴趣,这可能更加简单地反映这一点,这可能更适合允许标准化和高吞吐量。然而,越少的兴趣点和细胞反应是,我们应该越好,我们应该近似器官或组织样培养条件,以使生理反应更容易。除了这些技术进步外,质量保证和报告细胞培养的重要进展以及细胞试验系统的验证将细胞培养物的效用与新水平带来了效用。良好细胞文化实践(GCCP)的进步和更广泛实施是这里的关键。在毒理学中,这是有意义和可靠的结果的主要先决条件,最终支持风险评估和产品开发决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号