首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering Research & Design: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers >Life cycle assessment of optimised chemical looping air separation systems for electricity production
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of optimised chemical looping air separation systems for electricity production

机译:用于电力生产优化化学循环空气分离系统的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemical looping air separation (CLAS) is as a very promising technology for the production of pure oxygen through the cyclic reduction and oxidation of a solid material at elevated temperatures. This study focused on the environmental potential of electricity and CO2 production through oxyfuel combustion of lignite. First, an attributional LCA assessed the operations which mainly contribute to the total environmental impacts for two different scenarios at the limits of the operating window (100% and 25% active material). Then, this study analysed the potential of electricity and pure CO2 production through CLAS when compared with conventional power production technologies from renewable and fossil alternatives, including electricity from hydro power, electricity from wind power, electricity from nuclear, electricity from photovoltaic, electricity from biogas, electricity from biomass, electricity from waste, electricity from hard coal and electricity from natural gas. Overall the results, analysed per MJ of electricity produced, showed how the chemical looping technology consistently performs better than the other technologies, especially thanks to the recovery of the pure CO2 stream used for industrial purposes, which avoids the production of CO2 from fossil resources. However, the cleaning of the flue gas of the oxyfuel combusted lignite strongly limits the toxicities indicators. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:化学环路空气分离(CLA)是通过在升高的温度下通过固体材料的循环减少和氧化产生纯氧的非常有前途的技术。本研究专注于通过氧气燃烧的氧气燃烧电力和二氧化碳生产的环境潜力。首先,归属LCA评估了主要有助于在操作窗口限制(100%和25%活跃材料)的两个不同场景的环境影响的运营。随后,与可再生和化石替代品的传统电力生产技术相比,通过CLA分析了电力和纯二氧化碳生产的潜力,包括来自水电力量的电力,来自风电,来自核电,从沼气,来自沼气的电力的电力电力的电力。 ,从生物质,从废物的电力,从硬煤和来自天然气的电力的电力。总体而言,通过生产的电力分析结果,表明了化学循环技术如何比其他技术始终如一,特别是由于用于工业目的的纯二氧化碳流的恢复,这避免了来自化石资源的二氧化碳的生产。然而,清洁氧气燃烧的褐煤的烟气强烈限制毒性指标。 (c)2017年化学工程师机构。 elsevier b.v出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号