首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cambridge Open Access >Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment
【2h】

Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment

机译:乳制品生产系统的相对排放强度:在生命周期评估中采用不同的功能单元

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to assess the merit and suitability of individual functional units (FU) in expressing greenhouse gas emissions intensity in different dairy production systems. An FU provides a clearly defined and measurable reference to which input and output data are normalised. This enables the results from life-cycle assessment (LCA) of different systems to be treated as functionally equivalent. Although the methodological framework of LCA has been standardised, selection of an appropriate FU remains ultimately at the discretion of the individual study. The aim of the present analysis was to examine the effect of different FU on the emissions intensities of different dairy production systems. Analysis was based on 7 years of data (2004 to 2010) from four Holstein-Friesian dairy systems at Scotland’s Rural College’s long-term genetic and management systems project, the Langhill herd. Implementation of LCA accounted for the environmental impacts of the whole-farm systems and their production of milk from ‘cradle to farm gate’. Emissions intensity was determined as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents referenced to six FU: UK livestock units, energy-corrected milk yield, total combined milk solids yield, on-farm land used for production, total combined on- and off-farm land used for production, and the proposed new FU–energy-corrected milk yield per hectare of total land used. Energy-corrected milk was the FU most effective for reflecting differences between the systems. Functional unit that incorporated a land-related aspect did not find difference between systems which were managed under the same forage regime, despite their comprising different genetic lines. Employing on-farm land as the FU favoured grazing systems. The proposed dual FU combining both productivity and land use did not differentiate between emissions intensity of systems as effectively as the productivity-based units. However, this dual unit displayed potential to quantify in a simple way the positive or negative outcome of trade-offs between land and production efficiencies, in which improvement in emissions intensity using one FU may be accompanied by deterioration using another FU. The perceived environmental efficiencies of different dairy production systems in terms of their emissions intensities were susceptible to change based upon the FU employed, and hence the FU used in any study needs to be taken into account in the interpretation of results.
机译:这项研究旨在评估各个功能单元(FU)在表达不同乳制品生产系统中温室气体排放强度方面的优点和适用性。 FU为输入和输出数据的标准化提供了清晰定义和可测量的参考。这使得来自不同系统的生命周期评估(LCA)的结果可以视为功能等效。尽管LCA的方法学框架已经标准化,但最终选择合适的FU仍由各个研究自行决定。本分析的目的是研究不同FU对不同乳制品生产系统排放强度的影响。分析是基于苏格兰乡村学院长期基因和管理系统项目Langhill牛场的四个Holstein-Friesian乳制品系统的7年数据(2004年至2010年)得出的。 LCA的实施考虑了整个农场系统及其从“摇篮到农场大门”的牛奶生产对环境的影响。排放强度确定为参考六个FU的二氧化碳当量的千克:英国畜牧单位,经能量校正的奶产量,总乳固体总产量,用于生产的农场土地,用于生产的农场内外总土地生产,以及提议的每公顷总土地使用经FU能量校正的新牛奶产量。能量校正牛奶是最能反映系统之间差异的FU。尽管具有不同的遗传系,但结合了土地相关方面的功能单元在相同的饲草制度下管理的系统之间没有发现差异。 FU偏爱放牧系统,因此要在农场上使用土地。拟议的兼具生产力和土地利用的双重FU并没有像基于生产力的单位那样有效地区分系统的排放强度。然而,这种双重单元显示了以简单的方式量化土地和生产效率之间权衡的正面或负面结果的潜力,其中使用一个FU的排放强度的改善可能会伴随使用另一个FU的劣化。不同乳制品生产系统在排放强度方面的感知环境效率容易因所采用的FU而发生变化,因此,任何研究中使用的FU在解释结果时都应予以考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号