...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions >In reply to: Letter by Derimay et al. regarding the article, 'A randomized trial comparing two stent sizing strategies in coronary bifurcation treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - The Absorb Bifurcation Coronary (ABC) trial' by Rampat et al.
【24h】

In reply to: Letter by Derimay et al. regarding the article, 'A randomized trial comparing two stent sizing strategies in coronary bifurcation treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - The Absorb Bifurcation Coronary (ABC) trial' by Rampat et al.

机译:回复:Derimay等人的信。 关于制品,“随机试验,比较冠状动脉分叉治疗中的两支支架尺寸策略与生物血管血管支架 - rampat等人的吸收分叉冠状动脉(ABC)试验”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We would like to thank Derimay et al. for their interest in our study [1 ].In line with EBC recommendation, we agree that a distal sizing strategy is preferable when using metal stents to treat coronary bifurcation disease [2]. Such a strategy avoids distal oversizing while allowing correction of proximal malapposition with liberal Proximal Optimisation Technique without incurring a significant risk of damage to the stent. However caution must be exercised with the ABSORB BVS due to the inherent limits of its expansion capacity. In fact, this difference in mechanical properties between stent and scaffold was the main impetus behind
机译:我们要感谢Derimay等。 为了他们对我们的研究兴趣[1]。在EBC推荐中,我们同意使用金属支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病[2]时更优选远端大小尺寸策略[2]。 这种策略避免了远端超大,同时允许用自由主义的近端优化技术校正近端的MOLAPPORION,而不会产生对支架损坏的显着风险。 然而,由于其扩展能力的固有限制,必须小心使用吸收性BVS行使。 事实上,支架和脚手架之间的机械性能的这种差异是后面的主要动力

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号