首页> 外文期刊>Acta oncologica. >Cone beam computed tomography guided treatment delivery and planning verification for magnetic resonance imaging only radiotherapy of the brain
【24h】

Cone beam computed tomography guided treatment delivery and planning verification for magnetic resonance imaging only radiotherapy of the brain

机译:锥形束计算机体层摄影术指导治疗交付和计划验证,仅用于脑部磁共振成像

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Radiotherapy based on MRI only (MRI-only RT) shows a promising potential for the brain. Much research focuses on creating a pseudo computed tomography (pCT) from MRI for treatment planning while little attention is often paid to the treatment delivery. Here, we investigate if cone beam CT (CBCT) can be used for MRI-only image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and for verifying the correctness of the corresponding pCT.Material and methods. Six patients receiving palliative cranial RT were included in the study. Each patient had three-dimensional (3D) T1W MRI, a CBCT and a CT for reference. Further, a pCT was generated using a patch-based approach. MRI, pCT and CT were placed in the same frame of reference, matched to CBCT and the differences noted. Paired pCT-CT and pCT-CBCT data were created in bins of 10 HU and the absolute difference calculated. The data were converted to relative electron densities (RED) using the CT or a CBCT calibration curve. The latter was either based on a CBCT phantom (phan) or a paired CT-CBCT population (pop) of the five other patients.Results. Non-significant (NS) differences in the pooled CT-CBCT, MRI-CBCT and pCT-CBCT transformations were noted. The largest deviations from the CT-CBCT reference were < 1 mm and 1 degrees. The average median absolute error (MeAE) in HU was 184 34 and 299 +/- 34 on average for pCT-CT and pCT-CBCT, respectively, and was significantly different (p < 0.01) in each patient. The average MeAE in RED was 0.108 +/- 0.025, 0.104 +/- 0.011 and 0.099 +/- 0.017 for pCT-CT, pCT-CBCT phan (p < 0.01 on 2 patients) and pCT-CBCT pop (NS), respectively.Conclusions. CBCT can be used for patient setup with either MRI or pCT as reference. The correctness of pCT can be verified from CBCT using a population-based calibration curve in the treatment geometry.
机译:背景。仅基于MRI的放射疗法(仅MRI的RT)对大脑具有广阔的发展潜力。许多研究集中在通过MRI创建伪计算机断层扫描(pCT)来制定治疗计划,而对治疗的执行却很少关注。在这里,我们研究锥束CT(CBCT)是否可用于仅MRI图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)以及验证相应pCT的正确性。材料和方法。该研究包括六例接受姑息性颅脑放疗的患者。每位患者均接受了三维(3D)T1W MRI,CBCT和CT供参考。此外,使用基于补丁的方法生成了pCT。 MRI,pCT和CT置于同一参照系中,与CBCT相匹配,并记录了差异。在10 HU的箱中创建了成对的pCT-CT和pCT-CBCT数据,并计算了绝对差。使用CT或CBCT校准曲线将数据转换为相对电子密度(RED)。后者基于其他五名患者的CBCT体模(phan)或成对的CT-CBCT人群(pop)。注意到合并的CT-CBCT,MRI-CBCT和pCT-CBCT转换中的非显着(NS)差异。与CT-CBCT参考的最大偏差为<1毫米和1度。对于pCT-CT和pCT-CBCT,HU的平均中位绝对误差(MeAE)分别平均为184 34和299 +/- 34,并且在每位患者中均存在显着差异(p <0.01)。对于pCT-CT,pCT-CBCT phan(2名患者,p <0.01)和pCT-CBCT pop(NS),RED的平均MeAE分别为0.108 +/- 0.025、0.104 +/- 0.011和0.099 +/- 0.017结论。 CBCT可用于以MRI或pCT为参考的患者设置。可以使用治疗几何学中基于人群的校正曲线从CBCT验证pCT的正确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号