...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta oncologica. >Weight loss, appetite loss and food intake in cancer patients with cancer cachexia: Three peas in a pod? - analysis from a multicenter cross sectional study
【24h】

Weight loss, appetite loss and food intake in cancer patients with cancer cachexia: Three peas in a pod? - analysis from a multicenter cross sectional study

机译:患有恶病质的癌症患者的体重减轻,食欲不振和食物摄入量:豆荚里放着三个豌豆? -来自多中心横截面研究的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. How to assess cachexia is a barrier both in research and in clinical practice. This study examines the need for assessing both reduced food intake and loss of appetite, to see if these variables can be used interchangeably. A secondary aim is to assess the variance explained by food intake, appetite and weight loss by using tumor-related factors, symptoms and biological markers as explanatory variables. Material and methods. One thousand and seventy patients with incurable cancer were registered in an observational, cross sectional multicenter study. A total of 885 patients that had complete data on food intake (PG-SGA), appetite (EORTC QLQ-C30) and weight loss were included in the present analysis. The association between reduced food intake and appetite loss was assessed using Spearman's correlation. To find the explained variance of the three symptoms a multivariate analysis was performed. Results. The mean age was 62 years with a mean survival of 247 days and a mean Karnofsky performance status of 72. Thirteen percent of the patients who reported eating less than normal had good appetite and 25% who had unchanged or increased food intake had reduced appetite. Correlation between appetite loss and food intake was 0.50. Explained variance for the regression models was 44% for appetite loss, 27% for food intake and only 13% for weight loss. Conclusion. Both appetite loss and food intake should be assessed in cachectic patients since conscious control of eating may sometimes overcome appetite loss. The low explained variance for weight loss is probably caused by the need for more knowledge about metabolism and inflammation, and is consistent with the cancer cachexia definition that claims that in cachexia weight loss is not caused by reduced food intake alone. The questions concerning appetite loss from EORTC-QLQ C30 and food intake from PG-SGA seem practical and informative when dealing with advanced cancer patients.
机译:背景。如何评估恶病质是研究和临床实践中的障碍。这项研究探讨了评估减少食物摄入和食欲不振的必要性,以查看这些变量是否可以互换使用。第二个目的是通过使用与肿瘤相关的因素,症状和生物学标记作为解释变量来评估由食物摄入,食欲和体重减轻所解释的差异。材料与方法。在一项观察性,横断面多中心研究中注册了170例无法治愈的癌症患者。共有885名患者获得了食物摄入量(PG-SGA),食欲(EORTC QLQ-C30)和体重减轻的完整数据。使用Spearman相关性评估食物摄入减少与食欲不振之间的关联。为了找到三种症状的解释差异,进行了多元分析。结果。平均年龄为62岁,平均生存期为247天,平均Karnofsky行为状态为72。13%的人报告的进食量少于正常饮食食欲良好,而25%的人饮食不变或食物摄入量增加则食欲降低。食欲不振与食物摄入之间的相关性是0.50。回归模型的解释方差为食欲减退为44%,食物摄入为27%,体重减轻仅为13%。结论。恶病质患者应同时评估食欲不振和食物摄入,因为有意识地控制饮食有时可以克服食欲不振。体重减轻的较低解释方差可能是由于需要更多有关代谢和炎症的知识所致,并且与癌症恶病质的定义一致,该定义声称恶病质中体重减轻并非仅由食物摄入减少引起。与EORTC-QLQ C30的食欲不振以及PG-SGA的食物摄入有关的问题在与晚期癌症患者打交道时似乎是实用且有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号