...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta ophthalmologica >Cataract surgeons outperform medical students in Eyesi virtual reality cataract surgery: Evidence for construct validity
【24h】

Cataract surgeons outperform medical students in Eyesi virtual reality cataract surgery: Evidence for construct validity

机译:白内障外科医生在Eyesi虚拟现实白内障手术中胜过医学生:结构有效性的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate construct validity for modules hydromaneuvers and phaco on the Eyesi surgical simulator. Methods: Seven cataract surgeons and 17 medical students performed capsulorhexis, hydromaneuvers, phaco, navigation, forceps, cracking and chopping modules in a standardized manner. Three trials were performed on each module (two on phaco) in the above order. Performance parameters as calculated by the simulator for each trial were saved. Video recordings of the second trial of the modules capsulorhexis, hydromaneuvers and phaco were evaluated with the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Surgical Skill (OSATS) and Objective Structured Assessment of Cataract Surgical Skill (OSACSS) tools. Results: Cataract surgeons outperformed medical students with regard to overall score on capsulorhexis (p < 0.001, p = 0.035, p = 0.010 for the tree iterations, respectively), navigation (p = 0.024, p = 0.307, p = 0.007), forceps (p = 0.017, p = 0.03, p = 0.028). Less obvious differences in overall score were found for modules cracking and chopping (p = 0.266, p = 0.022, p = 0.324) and phaco (p = 0.011, p = 0.081 for the two iterations, respectively). No differences in overall score were found on hydromaneuvers (p = 0.588, p = 0.503, p = 0.773), but surgeons received better scores from the evaluations of the modified OSATS (p = 0.001) and OSACSS (capsulorhexis, p = 0.003; hydromaneuvers, p = 0.017; phaco, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Construct validity was found on several modules previously not investigated (phaco, hydromaneuvers, cracking and chopping, navigation), and our results confirm previously demonstrated construct validity for capsulorhexis and forceps modules. Interestingly, validation of the hydromaneuvers module required OSACSS video evaluation tool. A further development of the scoring system in the simulator for the hydromaneuvers module would be advantageous and make training and evaluation of progress more accessible and immediate.
机译:目的:研究Eyesi手术模拟器上模块水力操纵和phaco的构造有效性。方法:7名白内障外科医生和17名医学生以标准化的方式进行了撕囊术,水力操纵术,超声乳化术,导航术,镊子,裂伤和切碎模块。按照上述顺序,对每个模块进行了三个试验(在phaco上进行了两个试验)。保存由模拟器为每个试验计算的性能参数。使用改良的手术技能目标结构评估(OSATS)和白内障手术技能目标结构评估(OSACSS)工具评估了撕囊,水力操纵和phaco模块第二次试验的录像。结果:就白内障的总得分而言,白内障外科医生的表现优于医科学生(分别针对树迭代,p <0.001,p = 0.035,p = 0.010),导航(p = 0.024,p = 0.307,p = 0.007),镊子(p = 0.017,p = 0.03,p = 0.028)。对于模块破解和斩波(p = 0.266,p = 0.022,p = 0.324)和phaco(两次迭代分别为p = 0.011,p = 0.081),总得分的差异不太明显。液压操作的总体评分没有差异(p = 0.588,p = 0.503,p = 0.773),但外科医生通过改良的OSATS(p = 0.001)和OSACSS(撕囊,p = 0.003;液压操作)获得了更好的评分,p = 0.017;乳突管,p = 0.001)。结论:在以前没有研究过的几个模块(phaco,水力操纵,破裂和斩波,航行)上发现了构造有效性,我们的结果证实了先前证明的对撕囊和镊子模块的构造有效性。有趣的是,液压操纵模块的验证需要OSACSS视频评估工具。模拟器中用于水力机动模块的计分系统的进一步发展将是有利的,并使训练和进度评估更容易获得和立即进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号