首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular therapeutics >Clinical effectiveness and safety of antazoline‐based therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing pharmacological cardioversion of short‐duration atrial fibrillation in the emergency department
【24h】

Clinical effectiveness and safety of antazoline‐based therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing pharmacological cardioversion of short‐duration atrial fibrillation in the emergency department

机译:急诊冠状动脉疾病稳定冠状动脉疾病患者急性心房颤动患者急诊急性心房颤动患者的临床疗效与安全

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Introduction Options for a pharmacological cardioversion (CV) of short‐duration atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with a stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are limited to amiodarone or vernakalant. Antazoline has been reported to achieve high rates of AF conversion to sinus rhythm, but data on its effectiveness and, more importantly, safety in stable CAD patients, have been sparse. Aims To assess the effectiveness and safety of antazoline‐based therapy in patients with a stable CAD undergoing pharmacological CV of short‐duration AF in the emergency department (ED). Results A retrospective case‐control study. We conducted an analysis of medical records of patients with a stable CAD undergoing CV of short duration (≤48?hours) AF in the ED using intravenous antazoline. The main endpoints of the study were successful cardioversion of AF and hospitalization due to the adverse effects (AE) of the treatment. Between 2008 and 2012, out of 548 CVs, antazoline was administered 334 times: 138 in CAD and 196 in the control group. Patients in the CAD group were older and had more comorbidities than controls; 65 patients had had a history of myocardial infarction (MI). In CAD group, the effectiveness was higher (82.6% vs 63.8%, RB: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.14‐1.48], P ?=?0.0002) and the hospitalization rate due to AE was similar (1.4% vs 4.1%, RR: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.08‐1.65], P ?=?0.2054) to the control group. Among patients with CAD, a history of MI did not influence the effectiveness or safety of the CV ( P ?=?0.2252 and P ?=?1.0000, respectively). Conclusions In selected patients with a stable CAD, even with a history of MI, antazoline‐based CV of short‐duration AF may be an effective and safe therapeutic option.
机译:发明内容稳定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者短持续时间心房颤动(AF)的药理心脏致氢化率(CV)的选项仅限于胺碘酮或vernakalant。据报道,抗唑啉旨在实现高速转换为窦性心律,但数据有效性,更重要的是,稳定的CAD患者的安全性稀疏。旨在评估急性急诊科学患者稳定CAD患者患者的抗唑啉治疗的有效性和安全性。结果回顾性案例控制研究。我们使用静脉内抗唑啉在ED中进行稳定CAD的稳定CAD患者的病历进行了分析。该研究的主要终点是由于治疗的不良反应(AE)而成功的AF和住院的心脏致癌。在2008年至2012年间,在548中CVS中,抗唑啉在CAD和196中施用334次:138次。 CAD组的患者年龄较大,并且比对照有更多的合并症; 65名患者患有心肌梗死(MI)的历史。在CAD组中,有效性较高(82.6%vs 63.8%,RB:1.30 [95%CI:1.14-1.48],P?= 0.0002),AE引起的住院率相似(1.4%Vs 4.1%, RR:0.36 [95%CI:0.08-1.65],p?= 0.2054)到对照组。在CAD患者中,MI的历史不会影响CV的有效性或安全性(P?= 0.2252和P?=?1.0000)。结论在稳定CAD稳定的患者中,即使具有MI的历史,抗唑啉的短持续时间AF的CV可能是有效和安全的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号