...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Haematologica >Evaluation of long-term outcomes, cytogenetic and molecular responses with imatinib mesylate in early and late chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: A report from a single institute
【24h】

Evaluation of long-term outcomes, cytogenetic and molecular responses with imatinib mesylate in early and late chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: A report from a single institute

机译:甲磺酸伊马替尼在慢性慢性粒细胞白血病早期和晚期的长期结果,细胞遗传学和分子反应的评估:单个机构的报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Here we compare the management and survival outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who had early or late imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy. The cytogenetic and molecular responses of 189 CML patients were analyzed. Of this group, 121 patients were classified as the early chronic phase (ECP) group and started IM within 12 months of diagnosis. The other 68 patients were classified as the late chronic phase (LCP) group who had been treated with interferon (IFN)-alpha-2 and crossed over to IM more than 12 months after diagnosis. The overall rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) at last follow-up were 83.6 and 78.1% in the ECP and LCP groups, respectively. The CCyR rates were 89.3 (for ECP patients) versus 73.5% (for LCP patients; p < 0.0001). At last follow-up, 82.4% ECP and 64.2% LCP patients had achieved an MMR (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were noted between the two groups with regard to survival outcomes. Our experience reveals that IM is an effective rescue therapy in most CML LCP patients who are intolerant or in whom IFN-alpha therapy fails. Such therapeutic options should be considered in LCP patients, particularly in countries where IM may not be available.
机译:在这里,我们比较了接受早期或晚期甲磺酸伊马替尼(IM)治疗的慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的管理和生存结局。分析了189名CML患者的细胞遗传学和分子反应。在该组中,有121例患者被分类为早期慢性期(ECP)组,并在诊断后12个月内开始IM。其余68例患者归为慢性晚期(LCP)组,他们接受了干扰素(IFN)-α-2治疗,并在诊断后超过12个月转入IM。在ECP和LCP组中,最后一次随访的完全细胞遗传学应答(CCyR)和主要分子应答(MMR)的总发生率分别为83.6%和78.1%。 CCyR率是89.3(对于ECP患者),而对于73.5%(对于LCP患者; p <0.0001)。在最后一次随访中,有82.4%的ECP和64.2%的LCP患者达到了MMR(p <0.0001)。两组之间在生存结局方面没有显着差异。我们的经验表明,对于大多数不耐受或IFN-α治疗无效的CML LCP患者,IM是一种有效的抢救疗法。 LCP患者应考虑此类治疗选择,尤其是在可能无法获得IM的国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号