...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Two‐year clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping absorb scaffolds: An analysis of the ABSORB EXTEND single‐arm study
【24h】

Two‐year clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping absorb scaffolds: An analysis of the ABSORB EXTEND single‐arm study

机译:两年临床结果对重叠的患者吸收脚手架:吸收延伸单臂研究的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Preclinical data showed that overlapping (OVP) scaffolds might result in delayed healing and strut coverage compared to nonOVP scaffold segments. Furthermore, OVP in patients could result in increased periprocedure myocardial infarction (MI) rate secondary to side branch occlusion; however, little is known whether this may have an impact on long‐term clinical outcomes. Methods ABSORB EXTEND is a prospective, single‐arm, open‐label clinical study in which 812 patients were enrolled at 56 sites. In this study, we compared the immediate and 2‐year clinical outcomes of patients with OVP scaffolds ( n ?=?115) to those of patients with nonOVP scaffolds ( n ?=?697). The primary objective was the comparison of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiac death, MI and ischemic‐driven target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and scaffold thrombosis (ST) rates up to 2 years. Results Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between cohorts except for longer lesions in the OVP patients as expected (16.7?±?7.3 vs. 11.6?±?4.4 mm, P ??0.0001), higher lesion complexity (B2) and numerically smaller vessel size. In‐hospital, there was a marked increase in MACE in the OVP cohort (7.0 vs. 0.9%, P ?=?0.002), exclusively driven by a higher rate of periprocedure MI (7.0 vs. 0.9%, P ?=?0.002). Long‐term MACE did not significantly differ between groups (10.4% in the OVP cohort vs. 6.6% in the no‐OVP group, P ?=?0.1) with comparable rates of cardiac death (0.9 vs. 1.2%, P ?=?1.0) and ischemia‐driven TLR (1.7 vs. 2.5%, P ?=?1.0). Cumulative incidence of MI was higher in the OVP cohort (7.8 vs. 3.0%, P ?=?0.02). Of note, the rate of MI between hospital discharge and 2‐year follow‐up was lower in the OVP cohort (0.8 vs. 2.1%, P ?=?0.04). Cumulative incidence of definite/probable ST was relatively low and comparable between groups (1.8 vs. 1.5%, P ?=?0.7). Conclusions In this low‐to‐moderate complex population treated with the ABSORB scaffold the OVP group showed a higher incidence of periprocedure MI with no immediate or long‐term increase in cardiac death, TLR or ST.
机译:摘要背景临床前数据显示,与非ovp支架段相比,重叠(OVP)支架可能导致延迟愈合和支柱覆盖。此外,患者的OVP可能导致副分支闭塞的副腔心肌梗死(MI)率增加;然而,很少众所周知这可能对长期临床结果产生影响。方法吸收延伸是一种前瞻性,单臂,开放标签临床研究,其中812名患者注册了56个患者。在这项研究中,我们将OVP支架(N?= 115)的患者的直接和2年临床结果进行了比较到NonoVP支架患者的患者(n?= 697)。主要目的是重大不良心脏事件(MACE)(心脏死亡,MI和缺血驱动的目标病变血运重建[TLR])和支架血栓形成(ST)率长达2年的比较。结果基线临床和血管造影特性在群组中相当,除了ovp患者的更长病变,如预期的(16.7?±7.3〜11.3±4.4mm,p?0.0001),更高的病变复杂性(B2)和数值小的血管尺寸。在医院,OVP队列中的钉子术中有显着增加(7.0 vs.0.9%,p?= 0.002),专门推动较高的PeriprocedureMI(7.0与0.9%,p?= 0.002 )。长期智慧在群体之间没有显着差异(OVP队列中的10.4%,在NO-OVP组中,P?= 0.1),心脏死亡率的可比性率(0.9与1.2%,P?= ?1.0)和缺血驱动的TLR(1.7对2.5%,p?=?1.0)。 ovp队列中mi的累积发病率较高(7.8 vs.3.0%,p?= 0.02)。值得注意的是,在OVP队列中,医院出院和2年后续随访之间的MI率(0.8与2.1%,P?= 0.04)。累积的发病率/可能的ST相对较低,在基团之间相当(1.8 vs.1.5%,p?= 0.7)。在这种用吸收支架处理的这种低于适度的复杂人群中,OVP组均显示出更高的PeriprocedureMI的发病率,没有立即或长期增加心脏死亡,TLR或ST。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号