...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Drug‐coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2‐year results of the MDT‐2113 SFA Japan randomized trial
【24h】

Drug‐coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2‐year results of the MDT‐2113 SFA Japan randomized trial

机译:药物涂层球囊与未涂层经皮腔翻膜血管成形术治疗肤质股骨和近端Popliteal动脉中的动脉粥样硬化:2年的MDT-2113 SFA日本随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objectives To assess the longer‐term safety and efficacy of the IN.PACT Admiral (MDT‐2113) drug‐coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of de novo and non‐stented restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral and/or proximal popliteal arteries versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in a Japanese cohort. Background Although DCBs are the newest endovascular strategy for patients with peripheral artery disease presenting with femoropopliteal lesions, there remains a paucity of results in non‐Caucasian populations. Methods IN.PACT SFA Japan is an independently‐adjudicated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, single‐blinded trial. Endpoints through 2 years included primary patency and a composite safety endpoint of freedom from device‐ and procedure‐related death through 30?days, freedom from target limb major amputation and freedom from clinically‐driven target vessel revascularization at 24?months. Results One hundred patients were assigned by 2:1 randomization to treatment with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (n?=?68) or PTA (n?=?32). The groups were well‐matched at baseline. Mean lesion length for the DCB and PTA groups were 9.15?±?5.85 and 8.89?±?6.01?cm ( P ?=?0.838), respectively. Patients treated with DCB exhibited superior 24‐month primary patency compared to PTA (79.8% vs. 46.9%; log rank P ??0.001). The 24‐month clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate was 9.1% for DCB versus 20.7% for PTA ( P ?=?0.177). There were no device‐ or procedure‐related deaths, major amputations, or thromboses in either group. Conclusions Two‐year results from IN.PACT SFA Japan demonstrated persistently superior patency and low CD‐TLR rates through 2 years when compared to uncoated PTA in Japanese patients. These data are consistent with other IN.PACT DCB trials.
机译:摘要目的,评估in.pact海军上将(MDT-2113)药物涂层球囊(DCB)的长期安全性和疗效进行治疗浅层股骨和/或近端Popliteal中的De Novo和非支撑的恢复病变在日本队列中的动脉与未涂层经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)。背景技术虽然DCBS是具有股骨质衰老患者的外周动脉疾病患者的最新血管造型策略,但仍然存在非高加索人群的结果。方法in.Pact SFA日本是一个独立判断的,前瞻性,多中心,随机的单一盲目的试验。通过2年的终点包括主要通畅和自由的综合安全终点,通过30?天,从目标肢体主要截肢的自由和自由从临床驱动的目标血管血运重建于24个月。结果百分之百名患者分配2:1随机化与in.pact海军上将DCB(n?=Δ68)或pta(n?= 32)进行治疗。该群体在基线匹配。 DCB和PTA基团的平均值长度为9.15?±5.85和8.89?±6.01?cm(p?= 0.838)。与PTA相比,用DCB治疗的患者表现出优质的24个月的初级通用(79.8%与46.9%; LOG RANK P?& 0.001)。对于PTA的DCB与20.7%的240个月临床驱动的目标病变血运重建率为9.1%(P?= 0.177)。在任一组中没有任何可与程序或程序相关的死亡,主要截肢或血栓形成。结论PACT SFA日本的两年结果通过2年来通过日本患者未经涂覆的PTA持续优越的通畅和低CD-TLR率。这些数据与其他数据一致.Pact DCB试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号