首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Outcomes in patients with peripheral vascular disease following percutaneous coronary intervention
【24h】

Outcomes in patients with peripheral vascular disease following percutaneous coronary intervention

机译:经皮冠状动脉介入后外周血管疾病患者的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a contemporary setting, and to determine whether use of drug‐eluting stents (DESs) improves outcomes. Background PVD was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes following PCI in the bare‐metal stent (BMS) era. It is not known whether outcomes in these patients have improved with advances in interventional techniques and stent technology, as they have for the general population. Methods Eighteen thousand three hundred and eighty patients undergoing PCI from an Australian registry between 2005 and 2013 were studied. Clinical and procedural data, 30‐day and 12‐month outcomes were compared in those with and without a reported history of PVD. Outcomes were also compared between patients with PVD who received DES and those who received BMS. Long‐term mortality was compared using Australian National Death Index (NDI) linkage. Results Patients with PVD ( n ?=?1,251, 6.8%) were older and had more prevalent diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, renal impairment, ostial lesions, left main, and multi‐vessel disease ( p ??0.001). Patients with PVD had significantly higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) compared with those without PVD, in‐hospital (5.7% vs. 4.1%, p ??0.008), at 30‐days (8.6% vs. 5.8%, p ??0.001) and at 12‐months (24.6% vs. 13.2%, p ??0.001). At 4.9?±?2.6 years follow‐up, there was significantly greater mortality in the PVD group. PVD patients who received DES experienced significantly less MACE than PVD patients treated with BMS at 30‐days (4.8 vs. 10.1%, p ??0.001) and 12‐months (19.4 vs. 26.4%, p ??0.005). Conclusions PVD is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. PVD patient who received DES had improved outcomes compared with those receiving BMS.
机译:摘要目的,评价在当代环境中经皮冠状动脉疾病(PCI)的外周血血管疾病(PVD)临床特征和结果,并确定药物洗脱支架(DESS)是否改善了结果。背景技术PVD是裸金属支架(BMS)时代PCI之后的不利结果的独立危险因素。目前尚不清楚这些患者的结果是否有所改善,介入技术和支架技术的进步,因为它们对一般人群。方法研究了来自2005年至2013年澳大利亚注册机构的18000千分之一的PCI患者。在有没有报告的PVD历史的情况下比较了30天和程序数据,30天和12个月的结果。在接受德国的PVD患者和接受BMS的人之间也比较了结果。使用澳大利亚国家死亡指数(NDI)联系进行了长期死亡率。结果PVD患者(N?= 1,251,6.8%)较大,患有更普遍的糖尿病,高血压,脑血管疾病,心力衰竭,肾损伤,骨质病变,左主要和多血管疾病(P? 0.001)。与医院内没有PVD的那些%,p?0.001)和12个月(24.6%与13.2%,p≤0.001)。在4.9?±22.6年后续,PVD组的死亡率显着增加。接受DES的PVD患者经历了比在30天(4.8 vs.10.1%,P 1 10.1%,P 1 10.1%)和12个月(19.4与26.4%,P 1 0.3〜0.3〜0.30 )。结论PVD是接受PCI患者的不良结果的独立预测因子。与接受BMS相比,接受DES的PVD患者改善了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号