首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology: A Journal of Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment >Interventional Treatment Strategy for Primary Budd-Chiari Syndrome with Both Inferior Vena Cava and Hepatic Vein Involvement: Patients from Two Centers in China
【24h】

Interventional Treatment Strategy for Primary Budd-Chiari Syndrome with Both Inferior Vena Cava and Hepatic Vein Involvement: Patients from Two Centers in China

机译:介于腔静脉和肝静脉受累的介入治疗策略初级Budd-Chiari综合征:中国两个中心的患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThis retrospective study evaluated interventional treatments (recanalization, balloon dilation, and/or stent placement) for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), caused by combined obstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins (HVs).MethodsBefore and after interventional therapy, patients with BCS (n=162; asymptomatic 105.2103.3mo; follow-up 15 [6-24] mo) underwent imaging studies (color Doppler ultrasound, CT, or MRI), and inferior vena cavography and manometry. Venous lesions were characterized by occlusion features, and presence of thrombosis and peripheral collateral vessels.ResultsOne, 2, and 3 main HV occlusions were observed, respectively, in 25 (15.4%), 61 (37.7%), and 76 (46.9%) patients. Eighty-three (51.2%), 98 (60.5%), and 104 (64.2%) patients had, respectively, large accessory HVs, venous collaterals formed between the HVs, or venous communicating branches between the HV and the peritoneal veins. The middle, left, and right HV was patent in 32 (19.8%), 35 (21.6%), and 44 (27.2%) patients. Recanalization of both hepatic and caval occlusions was successful in 96% (51/53) of those attempted; recanalization of IVC occlusion was successful in 97% (106/109). Among 157 patients successfully treated, 146 were cured and 11 showed clinical improvement. Clinical symptoms were relieved in 82.4% after the initial intervention, and 94.2% after the second intervention.Conclusion Recanalization and balloon angioplasty was effective for the management of BCS with concurrent HV and IVC occlusions. The majority of patients required only IVC recanalization. The outcome of patients treated only by IVC intervention was similar to that of patients given combined HV and IVC intervention.
机译:对象的回顾性研究评估介入治疗(Encanization,Balloon扩张和/或支架放置)对芽 - Chiari综合征(BCS),由下腔静脉(IVC)和肝静脉(HVS)的组合梗阻引起.methodsBefore和介入后疗法,BCS患者(n = 162;无症状105.2103.3mo;随访15 [6-24] Mo)接受了成像研究(彩色多普勒超声,CT或MRI)和下腔机测控和测压。静脉病变的特征在于闭塞特征,以及血栓形成和外周侧壳血管的存在。分别观察到25(15.4%)61(37.7%)和76(46.9%)耐心。八十三(51.2%),98(60.5%)和104名(64.2%)患者分别具有大型辅助HVS,在HV和HV和腹膜静脉之间形成的静脉沟通。中间,左和右HV是32(19.8%),35(21.6%)和44名(27.2%)患者的专利。肝脏和穴穴闭塞的重新化成功于96%(51/53)的尝试; IVC闭塞的重新化成功97%(106/109)。在成功治疗的157名患者中,146例治愈,11例临床改善。在初始干预后82.4%的临床症状减轻了82.4%,在第二次干预后94.2%。结论重次化和气囊血管成形术,对BCS的管理有效,并进行了同时的HV和IVC闭塞。大多数患者只需要IVC再生化。仅通过IVC干预治疗的患者的结果与HV和IVC干预组合的患者相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号