首页> 外文期刊>Acta oncologica. >Estimated radiation pneumonitis risk after photon versus proton therapy alone or combined with chemotherapy for lung cancer.
【24h】

Estimated radiation pneumonitis risk after photon versus proton therapy alone or combined with chemotherapy for lung cancer.

机译:光子治疗与质子治疗或联合化疗联合治疗肺癌后估计的放射性肺炎风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, radiation therapy plans are optimized without consideration of chemotherapy. Here, we model the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in the presence of a possible interaction between chemotherapy and radiation dose distribution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three alternative treatment plans are compared in 18 non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with helical tomotherapy; the tomotherapy plan, an intensity modulated proton therapy plan (IMPT) and a three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plan. All plans are optimized without consideration of the chemotherapy effect. The effect of chemotherapy is modeled as an independent cell killing process using a uniform chemotherapy equivalent radiation dose (CERD) added to the entire organ at risk. We estimate the risk of grade 3 or higher RP (G3RP) using the critical volume model. RESULTS: The mean risk of clinical G3RP at zero CERD is 5% for tomotherapy (range: 1-18 %) and 14% for 3D-CRT (range 2-49%). When the CERD exceeds 9 Gy, however, the risk of RP with the tomotherapy plans become higher than the 3D-CRT plans. The IMPT plans are less toxic both at zero CERD (mean 2%, range 1-5%) and at CERD = 10 Gy (mean 7%, range 1-28%). Tomotherapy yields a lower risk of RP than 3D-CRT for 17/18 patients at zero CERD, but only for 7/18 patients at CERD = 10 Gy. IMPT gives the lowest risk of all plans for 17/18 patients at zero CERD and for all patients with CERD = 10 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The low dose bath from highly conformal photon techniques may become relevant for lung toxicity when radiation is combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy as shown here. Proton therapy allows highly conformal delivery while minimizing the low dose bath potentially interacting with chemotherapy. Thus, intensive drug-radiation combinations could be an interesting indication for selecting patients for proton therapy. It is likely that the IMRT plans would perform better if the CERD was accounted for during optimization, but more clinical data is required to facilitate evidence-based plan optimization in the multi-modality setting.
机译:背景:传统上,放射治疗计划是在不考虑化学疗法的情况下进行优化的。在这里,我们对化学疗法与放射剂量分布之间可能存在相互作用的情况下的放射性肺炎(RP)风险进行建模。材料与方法:比较了18例先前接受了螺旋断层扫描治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的三种替代治疗方案。断层扫描计划,强度调制质子治疗计划(IMPT)和三维共形放射治疗(3D-CRT)计划。在不考虑化学疗法效果的情况下优化了所有计划。化疗的效果被建模为一个独立的细胞杀伤过程,方法是将均匀的化疗等效辐射剂量(CERD)添加到有风险的整个器官。我们使用临界体积模型估算3级或更高RP(G3RP)的风险。结果:零剂量CERD时,临床G3RP的平均风险对于Tomotherapy为5%(范围:1-18%)和对于3D-CRT为14%(范围2-49%)。但是,当CERD超过9 Gy时,X线断层扫描计划的RP风险会高于3D-CRT计划。在CERD为零(平均2%,范围为1-5%)和CERD = 10 Gy(平均7%,范围为1-28%)时,IMPT计划的毒性均较小。对于零CERD的17/18患者,Tomotherapy产生的RP风险低于3D-CRT,但对于CERD = 10 Gy的患者,仅7/18患者。对于17/18的CERD为零的患者和所有CERD = 10 Gy的患者,IMPT的风险最低。结论当辐射与细胞毒性化学疗法联合使用时,高度共形光子技术产生的低剂量浴液可能与肺毒性相关,如下所示。质子疗法可实现高度保形的递送,同时最大程度地减少可能与化学疗法相互作用的低剂量浴。因此,强烈的药物-放射线结合可能是选择患者进行质子治疗的有趣指示。如果在优化过程中考虑了CERD,则IMRT计划可能会执行得更好,但是在多模式设置中,需要更多的临床数据来促进基于证据的计划优化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号