首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology clinics >Should His Bundle Pacing Be Preferred over Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Atrioventricular Junction Ablation?
【24h】

Should His Bundle Pacing Be Preferred over Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Atrioventricular Junction Ablation?

机译:在房室结合消融后,他的束起搏是否优于心脏再同步治疗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, which is particularly detrimental when patients develop rapid ventricular rates (RVR). Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation with pacemaker implantation has been used as a method of achieving rate control in patients with incessant AF with RVR. Right ventricular only pacing is known to be harmful in the setting of HF. His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing both offer durable pacing solutions that offer more physiologic activation. This review describes the benefits and drawbacks of HBP and BiV pacing in HF patients after AVJ ablation.
机译:心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)与高发病率和死亡率有关,当患者发育快速的心室率(RVR)时是特别有害的。 与起搏器注入的房室结(AVJ)消融已被用作具有RVR的不停式AF患者患者速率控制的方法。 右心室仅在HF的环境中有害。 他的捆绑起搏(HBP)和Biventricular(BIV)起搏两者都提供耐用的起搏解决方案,提供更多的生理活化。 该综述描述了AVJ消融后HB患者HBP和生物起搏的益处和缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号