...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology >Single versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Single versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:经齿轮管主动脉瓣植入后单一与双抗血小板治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is currently recommended in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), this practice is not supported by sufficient evidence. This study was performed to compare DAPT to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). Methods: An electronic search was completed of PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies comparing DAPT versus SAPT in patients undergoing TAVI were included. Results: Seven studies incorporating 1,445 patients were eligible for the present meta-analysis. There were no significant differences on 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63-2.25, p = 0.593), 6-month all-cause mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.49-2.53, p = 0.796), or 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63-2.25, p = 0.593). DAPT was associated with an increased risk for 30-day (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.85-4.58, p 0.01), 6-month (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.26-5.10, p 0.001), and 1-year major and lethal bleeding (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.04-6.77, p = 0.041) based on 896, 337, and 583 patients, respectively, compared to SAPT. Conclusion: Compared to SAPT, DAPT was not shown to be superior in reducing thrombotic events, but presented an increased risk of major/lifethreatening bleeding. More randomized controlled trials are needed to provide further evidence. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:目的:虽然目前推荐使用Aspirin和Clopidogrel的双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在经沟管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI)后,虽然在患者中推荐,但这种做法不受足够证据的支持。进行该研究以将DAPT与单一抗血小板治疗(SAPT)进行比较。方法:电子搜索完成了PubMed,Embase,Ovid Medline,科学网和控制试验的Cochrane中央登记。包括比较DAPT与SAPT在接受TAVI的患者中的研究。结果:七项研究含有1,445名患者的研究有资格获得目前的荟萃分析。 30天全因死亡率(或1.19,95%CI 0.63-2.25,P = 0.593),6个月全因死亡率(或1.11,95%CI 0.49-2.53,P = 0.796 )或1年的全因死亡率(或1.19,95%CI 0.63-2.25,P = 0.593)。 DAPT与30天的风险增加有关(或2.91,95%CI 1.85-4.58,P <0.01),6个月(或2.54,95%CI 1.26-5.10,P <0.001),1与SAPT相比,基于896,337和583名患者的临时和致命出血(或2.65,95%CI 1.04-6.77,P = 0.041)。结论:与SAPT相比,降低血栓形成事件的DAPT未显示出优异,但呈现出巨大/生命耐候出血的风险增加。需要更多随机对照试验来提供进一步的证据。 (c)2018年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号