首页> 外文期刊>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. >Concordance between the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 and the immune-related response criteria in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Concordance between the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 and the immune-related response criteria in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

机译:用Nivolumab处理的非小细胞肺癌患者的响应评估标准与实体瘤中的响应评估标准的一致性:多中心回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Purpose The immune-related response criteria (irRC) were proposed to incorporate pseudo-progression. However, the association between the irRC and overall survival (OS) has yet to be evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the concordance between the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and the irRC in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab, as well as, to determine the relationship between these two response criteria and OS. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 143 patients at three tertiary care hospitals in Japan between January and December 2016 (UMIN000022014). Results The weighted kappa statistic for the two response criteria was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.76). The Harrell’s C-index was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68–0.80) for the RECIST and 0.74 (95% CI 0.68–0.80) for the irRC, respectively. The difference between the two criteria was ??0.002 (95% CI ??0.05 to 0.04). The Moreau, O’Quigley, and Lellouch statistic was 0.03 for the RECIST and 0.17 for the irRC, respectively. Conclusion We demonstrated a good concordance between the RECIST and the irRC for predicting OS in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab.
机译:摘要目的,提出了免疫相关响应标准(IrrC)掺入伪进展。然而,尚未在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中尚未评估了IrC和总存活(OS)之间的关联。因此,本研究的目的是评估用NIVolumab处理的NSCLC患者的实体肿瘤(RECIST)版本1.1和ISTC之间的响应评估标准与ISTRC之间的一致性,以及确定这两个响应标准之间的关系和操作系统。方法采用2016年1月至12月(UMIN00322014)在日本的三高级护理医院对143名患者进行了回顾性队列研究(UMIN0022014)。结果两个响应标准的加权Kappa统计为0.72(95%置信区间(CI)0.66-0.76)。 Harrell的C折射分别为0.74(95%CI 0.68-0.80),分别为ISTC的重新入住和0.74(95%CI 0.68-0.80)。两个标准之间的差异为0.002(95%CI ?? 0.05至0.04)。莫鲁,O'Quigley和Lellouch统计分别为RECIST和ISTC的0.17分别为0.03。结论我们在用Nivolumab治疗的NSCLC患者中,在患有NSCLC患者中的再验证和ISRC之间表现出良好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号