首页> 外文期刊>Cytopathology >Assessing the wellbeing of cytoscreeners: experience in two NHS cytology laboratories.
【24h】

Assessing the wellbeing of cytoscreeners: experience in two NHS cytology laboratories.

机译:评估细胞筛选剂的健康:在两个NHS细胞学实验室的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Cervical screening programmes in England are in transition as the liquid-based cytology (LBC) method replaces conventional Papanicolaou screening and staff in NHS laboratories are trained to analyse LBC smears. Cytoscreeners and biomedical scientists undertake routine microscopy of slides, but the scientists usually have a wider professional role. Attitudinal surveys were carried out in laboratories where LBC was partially introduced. METHODS: Staff in two cytology laboratories in Greater Manchester were surveyed twice over 6 months. The questionnaire assessed work pressures using scales from the Measures of Work Characteristics instrument, work-related stress using the General Survey version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, job intentions and job satisfaction. RESULTS: Cytoscreeners, many aged over 50 years, formed over 60% of respondents in both surveys (27/42 in the first survey), and biomedical scientists and doctors, 30%. Both groups were under moderate pressure from work demands in each survey, but cytoscreeners had significantly less autonomy over their working methods (P < 0.001). Although both groups experienced similar levels of exhaustion, cytoscreeners were much more cynical or indifferent towards work in the second survey (P = 0.008) and had lower expectations of being effective (P < 0.001). For the cytoscreeners, there were strong negative correlations in both surveys between cynicism and the work characteristics of influencing decisions and autonomy/control. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the relationship between work performance and wellbeing serves to emphasize the importance of the new LBC technology in ameliorating low morale where it exists. Further attitudinal research involving larger samples of laboratories is warranted to assess the full impact of this innovation.
机译:目的:随着液基细胞学(LBC)方法取代传统的帕潘尼古拉普法筛查,英国的宫颈筛查计划正在转型中,并且经过NHS实验室人员的培训,他们可以分析LBC涂片。细胞筛选仪和生物医学科学家对载玻片进行常规显微镜检查,但科学家通常具有更广泛的专业作用。在部分引入了LBC的实验室中进行了态度调查。方法:六个月内对大曼彻斯特两个细胞学实验室的工作人员进行了两次调查。问卷使用“工作特征测量”工具的量表评估工作压力,使用Maslach倦怠量表的一般调查版,工作意向和工作满意度评估与工作有关的压力。结果:两项调查中,许多年龄超过50岁的细胞筛查者占60%(第一项调查为27/42),而生物医学科学家和医生则占30%。两组在每次调查中都承受着来自工作需求的中等压力,但细胞筛查者的工作方法自主性明显降低(P <0.001)。尽管两组人的疲惫程度相似,但在第二次调查中,细胞筛选者对工作的态度更愤世嫉俗或漠不关心(P = 0.008),对有效的期望却较低(P <0.001)。对于细胞筛查者,犬儒主义与影响决策和自治/控制的工作特征之间的两项调查均存在强烈的负相关性。结论:工作绩效与幸福感之间关系的强度有助于强调新的LBC技术在改善士气低落的地方的重要性。有必要进行涉及更大实验室样本的进一步态度研究,以评估这项创新的全部影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号