首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of earthquake engineering >The 2014 Earthquake Model of the Middle East: ground motion model and uncertainties
【24h】

The 2014 Earthquake Model of the Middle East: ground motion model and uncertainties

机译:2014年中东地震模型:地面运动模型与不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We summarize the main elements of a ground-motion model, as built in three-year effort within the Earthquake Model of the Middle East (EMME) project. Together with the earthquake source, the ground-motion models are used for a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) of a region covering eleven countries: Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Georgia, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria and Turkey. Given the wide variety of ground-motion predictive models, selecting the appropriate ones for modeling the intrinsic epistemic uncertainty can be challenging. In this respect, we provide a strategy for ground-motion model selection based on data-driven testing and sensitivity analysis. Our testing procedure highlights the models of good performance in terms of both data-driven and non-data-driven testing criteria. The former aims at measuring the match between the ground-motion data and the prediction of each model, whereas the latter aims at identification of discrepancies between the models. The selected set of ground models were directly used in the sensitivity analyses that eventually led to decisions on the final logic tree structure. The strategy described in great details hereafter was successfully applied to shallow active crustal regions, and the final logic tree consists of four models (Akkar and Cagnan in Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:2978-2995, 2010; Akkar et al. in Bull Earthquake Eng 12(1):359-387, 2014; Chiou and Youngs in Earthq Spectra 24:173-215, 2008; Zhao et al. in Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:898-913, 2006). For other tectonic provinces in the considered region (i.e., subduction), we adopted the predictive models selected within the 2013 Euro-Mediterranean Seismic Hazard Model (Woessner et al. in Bull Earthq Eng 13(12):3553-3596, 2015). Finally, we believe that the framework of selecting and building a regional ground-motion model represents a step forward in ground-motion modeling, particularly for large-scale PSHA models.
机译:我们总结了地面运动模式的主要要素,建立在中东地震模型(EMME)项目中的三年内部工作。与地震来源一起,地面运动模型用于涵盖11个国家的区域的概率地震危险评估(PSHA):阿富汗,亚美尼亚,阿塞拜疆,塞浦路斯,格鲁吉亚,伊朗,约旦,黎巴嫩,巴基斯坦,叙利亚和土耳其。鉴于各种地面运动预测模型,选择适当的用于建模内在的认识性不确定性可能具有挑战性。在这方面,我们提供了一种基于数据驱动测试和敏感性分析的地面运动模型选择策略。我们的测试程序在数据驱动和非数据驱动的测试标准方面突出显示了良好性能的模型。前者旨在测量地面运动数据与每个模型的预测之间的匹配,而后者旨在识别模型之间的差异。所选地面模型集直接用于最终导致最终逻辑树结构的决策的敏感性分析。以下详细描述的策略成功地应用于浅层有效的地壳区域,最终逻辑树由四种型号组成(阿克斯卡尔Soc Ac AM 100:2978-2995,2010; Akkar等人。在公牛地震eng 12(1):2014年359-387,2014; Chiou和Ornm在地球谱24:173-215,2008; Zhao等人。在公牛地震奖袜Soc上午96:898-913,2006)。对于被审议的地区的其他构造省份(即委员会),我们采用了2013年欧洲地中海地震危险模型中选择的预测模型(Woessner等人。在公牛地球Q 13(12):3553-3596,2015)中)。最后,我们认为选择和构建区域地面运动模型的框架代表了地面运动建模前进的一步,特别是对于大型PSHA模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号