...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway
【24h】

Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway

机译:用Glidescope视频喉镜随机比较鼻内插管的肌肌钳与普通气道患者对血管钳的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Purpose The GlideScope ? video laryngoscope (GVL) is widely used for nasotracheal intubation in dental and facial plastic surgery. The angle of the Magill forceps is different from that of the GVL blade, which suggests that the Magill forceps are not the ideal forceps for use with the GVL. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Magill forceps vs vascular forceps for nasotracheal intubation using the GVL. Methods This study included 60 patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation. Patients were assigned to one of two groups—i.e., Magill forceps (group M) or vascular forceps along with a tube exchanger (group V), by computer randomization. The primary outcome was total intubation time, defined as the time from when the anesthesiologist picked up the device to the time when three successive end-tidal CO 2 waves were obtained following intubation. Secondary outcomes were blood in the endotracheal tube and trauma to the oral tissues or teeth. A blind observer assessed the presence of sore throat one hour and 24 hr after surgery. Results The total intubation time was significantly different between group M and group V (96.1 sec and 78.1 sec, respectively; mean difference, 18 sec; 95% confidence interval (CI), 13.7 to 49.7). The incidence of epistaxis in group M was significantly greater than that in group V (46.7% vs 16.7%, respectively; relative risk, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.8). Conclusion The total intubation time was significantly less with the vascular forceps (and tube exchanger) than with the Magill forceps. Using vascular forceps also reduced the incidence of epistaxis compared with that using the Magill forceps. Using a tube exchanger and vascular forceps offers advantages over use of Magill forceps when a GlideScope video laryngoscope is used for nasotracheal intubation. Trial registration: http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/cris2/en/ , CRIS, KCT0001310. Registered 29 July 2014.
机译:摘要目的是Glidescope? Video Laryngoscope(GVL)广泛用于牙科和面部整形手术中的鼻腔插管。 Magill Forceps的角度与GVL刀片的角度不同,这表明Magill镊子不是与GVL一起使用的理想钳子。本研究的目的是使用GVL比较Magill Forceps对鼻腔插管的血管钳的有效性。方法本研究包括60名患者,该患者预定接受选修手术需要鼻腔插管。将患者分配给两组-I.E中的一个-i.e.,Magill Forceps(M)或血管钳以及管道交换器(组V),通过计算机随机化。主要结果是总插管时间,定义为从麻醉师何时拾取到插管之后获得三个连续的潮二氧二氧化碳波的时间。二次结果是气管导管中的血液和口腔组织或牙齿的创伤。盲目观察者在手术后1小时和24小时评估喉咙痛的存在。结果群体和第五组(96.1秒和78.1秒)之间的总插管时间显着不同;平均差异,18秒; 95%置信区间(CI),13.7至49.7)。 M群中Epistaxis的发生率显着大于V组(分别为46.7%,分别为16.7%;相对风险,2.8; 95%CI,1.2至6.8)。结论血管钳(管道交换器)与Magill镊子相比,总插管时间明显较小。使用血管钳也降低了与使用Magille Forceps相比的Epistaxis的发生率。使用管道交换器和血管钳提供在Glidescope Video Laryncops用于鼻外插管时使用Magill Forceps的优势。审判登记:http://www.who.int/ctp/network/cris2/en/,cris,kct0001310。 2014年7月29日注册。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 麻醉学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号