首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >Comparing long-term local recurrence rates of surgical and non-surgical management of close anterior margins in breast conserving surgery
【24h】

Comparing long-term local recurrence rates of surgical and non-surgical management of close anterior margins in breast conserving surgery

机译:比较乳房保守手术紧密前边缘外科手术和非外科管理的长期局部复发率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeWhile it is known that histologically involved margins lead to a higher local recurrence rate, re-excision of anterior margins is less common than that of radial margins. However, there are minimal long-term data on the oncological safety of non-surgical management of anterior margins.Patients and methodsA retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent breast conserving surgery for breast cancer between 2000 and 2008 at two tertiary referral centres. A close margin was defined as disease within two mm of the resection margin (including disease at the margin).Results6922 patients underwent surgery for invasive or in situ breast cancer of whom 277 patients had a close anterior margin alone after breast conserving surgery. Two hundred and twenty patients had non-surgical management of their margins, while 57 had re-excision surgery. Overall, there were 4/57 local recurrences in the surgical management group and 12/220 in the non-surgical management group. The local recurrence-free survival rate at 5years was 98.2% (1 recurrence, 95% CI 87.8-99.7) in the surgical management group and 97.2% (6 recurrences, 95% CI 93.8-98.7) in the non-surgical management group. At 10years, the rates were 92.2% (4 recurrences, 95% CI 80.3-97.0) in the surgical management group and 93.9% (12 recurrences, 95% CI 89.4-96.5) in the non-surgical management group. There was no significant difference found in the local recurrence rate between management groups (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.40, 3.85; p=0.71).ConclusionsLocal recurrence rates are acceptable and similar in both the surgically and non-surgically managed groups. Non-surgical management of close anterior margins appears oncologically safe when combined with appropriate adjuvant therapy.
机译:目的似乎已知组织学涉及的利润导致局部复发率更高,前缘的再切除不太常见于径向边缘。然而,有关于前余量的非手术管理的肿瘤肿瘤治疗的长期数据。对2000年至2008年乳腺癌乳腺癌的所有患者进行了回顾性研究,在两个第三节推荐中心之间进行了乳腺癌患者。关闭边缘被定义为两毫米切除缘(包括疾病的疾病)。结果6922患者接受侵袭性或原位乳腺癌的患者,其中277名患者在乳房保守手术后单独接近前缘。二百二十名患者对其边缘的非手术管理,而57则重新切除手术。总体而言,手术管理集团和12/220中有4/57本地复发,在非手术管理组中。在5年的局部复发存活率在手术管理组中为98.2%(1次复发,95%CI 87.8-99.7),在非外科管理组中97.2%(6个复发,95%CI 93.8-98.7)。在10年,该率为92.2%(4个复发,95%CI 80.3-97.0),在外科管理组中93.9%(12个复发,95%CI 89.4-96.5)。管理组之间的局部复发率没有显着差异(HR 1.24,95%CI 0.40,3.85; p = 0.71)。Conclusions本地复发率在手术和非手术组中可接受且相似。当与适当的佐剂治疗结合时,关闭前缘的非手术管理在骨科安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号