...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >Is the blood pressure of right arm measured with synchronous four-limb method is equal to that with single arm method?
【24h】

Is the blood pressure of right arm measured with synchronous four-limb method is equal to that with single arm method?

机译:是用同步四肢测量的右臂的血压等于用单臂方法等于它吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Synchronous four-limb blood pressure (BP) measurement (four-limb method) is widely used for diagnosing peripheral artery diseases in clinical practise, but it is unclear whether the BP of right arm measured with this method is similar to that measured with single arm method. Methods: This study included 198 in-patients (aged 18–89, mean age 60.1± 13.9 years old, 109 males). They were divided into four groups on the therapy as renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (46 patients), calcium channel blocker (43 patients), beta receptor blocker (27 patients), and combination (Com, 82 patients) groups. The patients were randomly instructed to follow one of two BP measurement proposals designed to avoid the bias induced by BP measurement order. The result with single arm method was recorded as RA-1 and that with four-limb method as RA-4. The difference between RA-4 and RA-1 was calculated as Dif-RA. The percentage increase (PI) was also calculated on the formula: (RA-4 ? RA-1)/RA-1. Results: The mean Dif-RA on SBP and DBP were 1.9/1.5 mmHg. Although the levels of SBP, DBP and pulse pressure of RA-1 were different, the PI of these parameters were comparable among four treatment groups. Multivariate regression analyses showed that age and SBP of RA-1 were positive independent factors for Dif-RA on SBP. Conclusion: The SBP and DBP of right arm measured with synchronous four-limb method are 1.9/1.5 mmHg higher against the single arm method in treated hypertensives, and the increase extent of BP is not associated with the used drugs.
机译:目的:同步四肢血压(BP)测量(四肢法)广泛用于临床实践中诊断外周血动脉疾病,但目前尚不清楚使用该方法测量的右臂BP是否类似于测量单臂方法。方法:本研究包括198例患者(年龄18-89岁,平均年龄为60.1±13.9岁,109名男性)。将它们分为治疗的四组作为肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂(46名患者),钙通道阻滞剂(43名患者),β受体阻滞剂(27例),以及组合(COM,82名患者)组。随机指示患者遵循两个BP测量建议中的一个,旨在避免由BP测量顺序引起的偏差。用单臂方法的结果被记录为RA-1,具有四肢法作为RA-4。 RA-4和RA-1之间的差异计算为DIF-RA。还在公式下计算增加(PI):( RA-4?RA-1)/ RA-1。结果:SBP和DBP上的平均差异为1.9 / 1.5mmHg。虽然RA-1的SBP,DBP和脉冲压力的水平不同,但是这些参数的PI在四个治疗组之间具有相当的相当。多元回归分析表明,RA-1的年龄和SBP是SBP上差异的阳性独立因子。结论:用同步四肢方法测量的右臂的SBP和DBP均为1.9 / 1.5mmHg,对治疗的高胶体测量的单臂方法较高,BP的增加程度与二手药物无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号