首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Intrapartum obstetric care in the United States military: Comparison of military and civilian care systems within TRICARE TRICARE
【24h】

Intrapartum obstetric care in the United States military: Comparison of military and civilian care systems within TRICARE TRICARE

机译:在美国军事中的内塔姆塔姆产科护理:Tricare Tricare中军事和民用护理系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Expectant mothers who are beneficiaries of TRICARE (universal insurance to United States Armed Services members and their dependents) can choose to receive care within direct (salary‐based) or purchased (fee‐for‐service) care systems. We sought to compare frequency of intrapartum obstetric procedures and outcomes such as severe acute maternal morbidity ( SAMM ) and common postpartum complications between direct and purchased care systems within TRICARE . Methods TRICARE (2006‐2010) claims data were used to identify deliveries. Patient demographics, frequency of types of delivery (noninstrumental vaginal, cesarean, and instrumental vaginal), comorbid conditions, SAMM , and common postpartum complications were compared between the two systems of care. Multivariable models adjusted for patient clinical/demographic factors determined the odds of common complications and SAMM complications in purchased care compared with direct care. Results A total of 440?138 deliveries were identified. Compared with direct care, purchased care had higher frequency (30.9% vs 25.8%, P .001) and higher adjusted odds ( aOR 1.37 [ CI 1.34‐1.38]) of cesarean delivery. In stratified analysis by mode of delivery, purchased care had lower odds of common complications for all modes of delivery ( aOR [ CI ]:noninstrumental vaginal: 0.72 [0.71‐0.74], cesarean: 0.71 [0.68‐0.75], instrumental vaginal: 0.64 [0.60‐0.68]) than direct care. However, purchased care had higher odds of SAMM complications for cesarean delivery ( aOR 1.31 [ CI 1.19‐1.44]) compared with direct care. Conclusion Direct care has a higher vaginal delivery rate but also a higher rate of common complications compared with purchased care. Study of direct and purchased care systems in TRICARE may have potential use as a surrogate for comparing obstetric care between salary‐based systems and fee‐for‐service systems in the United States .
机译:摘要背景是Tricare受益人的预期母亲(普遍保险到美国武装服务成员及其家属)可以选择在直接(基于工资)或购买(服务费)护理系统内的护理。我们试图比较在Tricare内直接和购买的护理系统之间严重急性产妇发病率(SAMM)和常见产后并发症等人产科程序和结果的频率。方法TRICARE(2006-2010)声明数据用于识别交付。在两个护理系统之间比较了患者人口统计学,递送类型(非特性阴道,剖宫产,辅助阴道),合并症条件,SAMM和常见的产后并发症。针对患者临床/人口统计因子调整的多变量模型确定了与直接护理相比购买护理的常见并发症和SAMM并发症的几率。结果总共440?138次交付。与直接护理相比,购买的护理频率较高(30.9%vs 25.8%,P& .001)和剖腹产的更高调整的赔率(AOR 1.37 [CI 1.34-1.38])。通过交付方式分层分析,购买的护理对所有递送方式的常见并发症的常见并发症较少[0.60-0.68])比直接护理。然而,与直接护理相比,购买的护理有较高的SAMM并发症的几率并发症(AOR 1.31 [CI 1.19-1.44])。结论直接护理具有更高的阴道递送率,还与购买的护理相比较高的常见并发症。 Tricare中直接和购买的护理系统的研究可能有潜在用作比较美国薪水的系统和服务费系统之间的产科护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号