首页> 外文期刊>Biostatistics >Estimating causal effects from a randomized clinical trial when noncompliance is measured with error
【24h】

Estimating causal effects from a randomized clinical trial when noncompliance is measured with error

机译:估算随机临床试验的因果效应,当不符合误差时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Noncompliance or non-adherence to randomized treatment is a common challenge when interpreting data from randomized clinical trials. The effect of an intervention if all participants were forced to comply with the assigned treatment (i.e., the causal effect) is often of primary scientific interest. For example, in trials of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes, policymakers are interested in their effect on smoking behavior if their use were to be compelled by regulation. A variety of statistical methods to estimate the causal effect of an intervention have been proposed, but these methods, including inverse probability of compliance weighted (IPCW) estimators, assume that participants’ compliance statuses are reported without error. This is an untenable assumption when compliance is based on self-report. Biomarkers (e.g., nicotine levels in the urine) may provide more reliable indicators of compliance but cannot perfectly discriminate between compliers and non-compliers. However, by modeling the distribution of the biomarker as a mixture distribution and writing the probability of compliance as a function of the mixture components, we show how the probability of compliance can be directly estimated from the data even when compliance status is unknown. To estimate the causal effect, we develop a new approach which re-weights participants by the product of their probability of compliance given the observed data and the inverse probability of compliance given confounders. We show that our proposed estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal and show that in some situations the proposed approach is more efficient than standard IPCW estimators. We demonstrate via simulation that the proposed estimator achieves smaller bias and greater efficiency than ad hoc approaches to estimating the causal effect when compliance is measured with error. We apply our method to data from a recently completed randomized trial of VLNC cigarettes.
机译:在解释随机临床试验中的数据时,不合规或非遵守随机治疗是常见的挑战。干预如果所有参与者被迫遵守所指定的治疗(即因因果效应),则效果通常是初级科学兴趣。例如,在非常低的尼古丁含量(VLNC)香烟的试验中,如果他们使用的使用,政策制定者对其对吸烟行为的影响感兴趣。提出了各种估计干预的因果效果的统计方法,但这些方法包括符合符合性加权(IPCW)估计的概率(IPCW),假设参与者的合规性状态毫不疑问地报告。当合规基本基于自我报告时,这是一个无法维持的假设。生物标志物(例如,尿液中的尼古丁水平)可以提供更可靠的合规指标,但不能完全区分对象和非对象之间。然而,通过将生物标志物的分布作为混合分布和作为混合组分的函数的函数建模,即使在合规状态未知的情况下,也可以展示如何从数据中直接估计合规性的概率。为了估算因果效应,我们开发了一种新的方法,通过赋予观察到的数据和遵守混淆的符合性的逆概率来重量参与者的概率。我们表明,我们的建议估算者是一致的和渐近正常的,并表明在某些情况下,所提出的方法比标准的IPCW估算者更有效。我们通过模拟证明所提出的估计器的偏差较小,比临时效率更大,效率更高,以估计符合符合误差时符合符合符合规定。我们将我们的方法从最近完成的VLNC卷烟的随机试验中应用于数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号