首页> 外文期刊>Biopreservation and biobanking >Feasibility and Comparison Study of Fecal Sample Collection Methods in Healthy Volunteers and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Using 16S rRNA and Metagenomics Approaches
【24h】

Feasibility and Comparison Study of Fecal Sample Collection Methods in Healthy Volunteers and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Using 16S rRNA and Metagenomics Approaches

机译:使用16S RRNA和Metagenomics方法的健康志愿者和固体器官移植受体中粪便样品收集方法的可行性和比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The human microbiome encompasses a variety of microorganisms that change dynamically and are in close contact with the body. The microbiome influences health and homeostasis, as well as the immune system, and any significant change in this equilibrium (dysbiosis) triggers both acute and chronic health conditions. Microbiome research has surged, in part, due to advanced sequencing technologies enabling rapid, accurate, and cost-effective identification of the microbiome. A major prerequisite for stool sample collection to study the gut microbiome in longitudinal prospective studies requires standardized protocols that can be easily replicated. However, there are still significant bottlenecks to stool specimen collection that contribute to low patient retention rates in microbiome studies. These barriers are further exacerbated in solid organ transplant recipients where diarrhea is estimated to occur in up to half the patient population. We sought to test two relatively easy sample collection methods (fecal swab and wipes) and compare them to the more cumbersome "gold" standard collection method (scoop) using two different sequencing technologies (16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics). Our comparison of the collection methods shows that both the swabs and the wipes are comparable to the scoop method in terms of bacterial abundance and diversity. The swabs, however, were closer in representation to the scoop and were easier to collect and process compared to the wipes. Potential contamination of the swab and the wipe samples by abundant skin commensals was low in our analysis. Comparison of the two sequencing technologies showed that they were complementary, and that 16S sequencing provided enough coverage to detect and differentiate between bacterial species identified in the collected samples. Our pilot study demonstrates that alternative collection methods for stool sampling are a viable option in clinical applications, such as organ transplant studies. The use of these methods may result in better patient retention recruitment rates in serial microbiome studies.
机译:人的微生物组包括各种微生物,可动态变化,并且与身体紧密接触。微生物组影响了健康和稳态,以及免疫系统,以及这种平衡(困难)的任何显着变化触发了急性和慢性健康状况。由于高级测序技术,微生物组研究飙升,可以快速,准确,经济高效地识别微生物组。在纵向前瞻性研究中研究肠道样品收集的主要先决条件,需要可以轻松复制的标准化协议。然而,仍有显着的瓶颈到粪便标本收集有助于微生物组研究中的低患者保留率。这些屏障在固体器官移植受者中进一步加剧,其中估计腹泻发生在患者群体的一半。我们试图测试两种相对容易的样品收集方法(粪便拭子和擦拭物),并使用两种不同的测序技术(16S核糖体RNA测序和霰弹枪Metagenomics)进行比较到更麻烦的“金”标准收集方法(Scoop)。我们对收集方法的比较表明,在细菌丰度和多样性方面,拭子和擦拭织物均与勺方法相当。然而,与铲子相比,拭子与勺子的代表更接近,更容易收集和处理。在我们的分析中,通过丰富的皮肤共生通过丰富的皮肤共生潜在污染和擦拭样品。两种测序技术的比较显示它们是互补的,并且16S测序提供了足够的覆盖率来检测和分化收集样品中鉴定的细菌种类。我们的试验研究表明,粪便采样的替代收集方法是临床应用中的可行选择,例如器官移植研究。这些方法的使用可能导致序列微生物组研究中更好的患者保留募集率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号