...
首页> 外文期刊>Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition >Unequivocal evidence supporting the segregated flow intestinal model that discriminates intestine versus liver first‐pass removal with PBPK modeling
【24h】

Unequivocal evidence supporting the segregated flow intestinal model that discriminates intestine versus liver first‐pass removal with PBPK modeling

机译:支撑分离流动肠模型的明确概念证据,以鉴别肠与肝脏首先用PBPK建模去除肠道

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Merits of the segregated flow model (SFM), highlighting the intestine as inert serosa and active enterocyte regions, with a smaller fractional (f Q 0.3) intestinal flow (Q I ) perfusing the enterocyte region, are described. Less drug in the circulation reaches the enterocytes due to the lower flow (f Q Q I ) in comparison with drug administered into the gut lumen, fostering the idea of route‐dependent intestinal removal. The SFM has been found superior to the traditional model (TM), which views the serosa and enterocytes totally as a well‐mixed tissue perfused by 100% of the intestinal flow, Q I . The SFM model is able to explain the lower extents of intestinal metabolism of enalapril, morphine and midazolam with i.v. vs. p.o. dosing. For morphine, the urine/bile ratio of the metabolite, morphine glucuronide MG urine MG bile for p.o. was 2.6× that of i.v. This was due to the higher proportion of intestinally formed morphine glucuronide, appearing more in urine than in bile due to its low permeability and greater extent of intestinal formation with p.o. administration. By contrast, the TM predicted the same MG urine MG bile for p.o. vs. i.v. The TM predicted that the contributions of the intestine:liver to first‐pass removal were 46%:54% for both p.o. and i.v. The SFM predicted same 46%:54% (intestine:liver) for p.o., but 9%:91% for i.v. By contrast, the kinetics of codeine, the precursor of morphine, was described equally well by the SFM‐ and TM‐PBPK models, a trend suggesting that intestinal metabolism of codeine is negligible. Fits to these PBPK models further provide insightful information towards metabolite formation: available fractions and the fractions of hepatic and total clearances that form the metabolite in question. The SFM‐PBPK model is useful to identify not only the presence of intestinal metabolism but the contributions of the intestine and liver for metabolite formation. Copyright ? 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:摘要分离流动模型(SFM)的优点,突出肠炎,作为惰性血清瘤和活性肠细胞区域,具有灌注肠细胞区域的较小的分数(F Q< 0.3)肠道流动(Qi)。循环中的药物较少到达肠细胞,由于较低的流量(F Q Q I)与肠道腔内的药物相比,促进了依赖于肠道肠道的概念。 SFM已被发现优于传统的模型(TM),该模型(TM)将血清瘤和肠细胞视为灌注100%的肠道流动,Q I的混合组织。 SFM模型能够用I.V解释烯丙胺,吗啡和咪达唑仑的肠道代谢的较低范围。 vs.p.o.给药。对于吗啡,代谢产物的尿液/胆汁比例,吗啡葡萄糖醛酸镁尿粉丝钳P.O.是2.6×I.v.这是由于肠道形成的葡萄糖醛葡萄糖比例较高,由于其低渗透性和肠形成程度,尿液在尿液中出现多于胆汁的尿液。行政。相比之下,TM预测了P.O的相同Mg尿mg胆汁。 vs. i.v. TM预测肠道的贡献:P.O的肝脏肝脏掺入肝脏的贡献为46%:54%。和i.v. SFM预测相同的46%:54%(肠道:肝脏),但为I.V的9%:91%。相比之下,通过SFM-and TM-PBPK模型同样良好地描述了Comeine,吗啡的前体,表明肠道代谢的趋势是可忽略不计的。适合这些PBPK模型进一步提供了致密地形成的富有洞察力的信息:可用的分数和肝脏和完全间隙的分数,形成所讨论的代谢产物。 SFM-PBPK模型不仅可识别肠道代谢的存在,而且是肠道和肝脏对代谢物形成的贡献。版权? 2016年John Wiley& SONS,LTD.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号