首页> 外文期刊>Biological Psychology >Distinct brain activation in response to negative feedback at different stages in a variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
【24h】

Distinct brain activation in response to negative feedback at different stages in a variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

机译:响应威斯康星州卡分拣试验变体中不同阶段的负反馈的明显大脑激活

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Positive or negative feedback is usually used to maintain or shift a sorting rule in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Previous studies have demonstrated that negative feedback evokes a larger P3 than positive feedback. However, it is unclear whether the neural response is different for negative feedback appearing at different stages of the WCST. We compared ERPs evoked by the negative feedback appearing at the rule-switching stage (switch-NF) with those appearing at the rule-learning stage (learn-NF) in a modified WCST. Results indicated that 1) switch-NF evoked a longer N1 latency than learn-NF, 2) switch-NF evoked a delayed and larger N2 component than learn-NF, particularly at the frontal and central electrodes, 3) P3 latency was shorter and the P3 amplitude was larger in learn-NF than in switch-NF. These findings suggest that in the different stages of the WCST, negative feedback implied different involvement of attention, inhibition control, and context updating.
机译:正或负反馈通常用于维护或转移威斯康星卡分类测试(WCST)中的分类规则。 以前的研究表明,负反馈唤起比正反馈更大的P3。 然而,目前尚不清楚神经响应是否不同于WCST的不同阶段的负反馈。 我们比较了通过在修改的WCST中出现在规则 - 切换阶段(Switch-NF)处的负反馈来诱使ERP诱使的ERP诱使。 结果表明,Switch-NF唤起比Learn-NF的更长的N1延迟,2)切换 - NF诱发的延迟和较大的N2组分而不是Learn-NF,特别是在额头和中心电极,3)P3延迟较短和 Learn-NF的P3幅度比开关NF更大。 这些发现表明,在WCST的不同阶段,负面反馈暗示着关注,抑制控制和上下文更新不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号