首页> 外文期刊>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology >The importance of blood rheology in patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulation of stenotic carotid arteries
【24h】

The importance of blood rheology in patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulation of stenotic carotid arteries

机译:血液流变学在狭窄颈动脉患者特异性计算流体动力学模拟中的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, which is the main cause of cardiovascular diseases, correlate with local haemodynamic factors such as wall shear stress (WSS). Numerical simulations such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on medical imaging have been employed to analyse blood flow in different arteries with and without luminal stenosis. Patient-specific CFD models, however, have assumptions on blood rheology. The differences in the calculated haemodynamic factors between different rheological models have not been fully evaluated. In this study, carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on six patients with different degrees of carotid stenosis and two healthy volunteers. Using the 3D reconstructed carotid geometries and the patient-specific boundary conditions, CFD simulations were performed by applying a Newtonian and four non-Newtonian models (Carreau, Cross, Quemada and Power-law). WSS descriptors and pressure gradient were analysed and compared between the models. The differences in the maximum and the average oscillatory shear index between the Newtonian and the non-Newtonian models were lower than 12.7% and 12%, respectively. The differences in pressure gradient were also within 15%. The differences in the mean time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) between the Newtonian and Cross, Carreau and Power-law models were lower than 6%. In contrast, a higher difference (26%) was found in Quemada. For the low TAWSS, the differences from the Newtonian to the non-Newtonian models were much larger, in the range of 0.4-31% for Carreau, 3-22% for Cross, 5-51% for Quemada and 10-41% for Power-law. The study suggests that the assumption of a Newtonian model is reasonable when the overall flow pattern or the mean values of the WSS descriptors are investigated. However, the non-Newtonian model is necessary when the low TAWSS region is the focus, especially for arteries with severe stenosis.
机译:动脉粥样硬化的起始和进展,是心血管疾病的主要原因,与壁剪切应力(WSS)等局部血管动力因子相关。基于医学成像的计算流体动力学(CFD)的数值模拟已被用来分析不同动脉的血流,无腔狭窄。然而,特定于患者的CFD模型对血液流变学具有假设。尚未完全评估不同流变模型之间计算出的血管动力因子的差异。在该研究中,颈动脉磁共振成像(MRI)是对六名不同程度的颈动脉狭窄和两个健康志愿者进行的患者进行。使用3D重建的颈动脉几何形状和患者特异性边界条件,通过应用牛顿和四个非牛顿模型(Carreau,Cross,Squemada和Power-Law)来执行CFD模拟。在模型之间分析并比较了WSS描述符和压力梯度。牛顿和非牛顿模型之间的最大和平均振荡剪切指数的差异分别低于12.7%和12%。压力梯度的差异也在15%以内。牛顿和交叉,卡特雷克和幂律模型之间平均时间平均的WSS(TAWS)的差异低于6%。相比之下,Quemada发现更高的差异(26%)。对于低Tawss,牛特对非牛顿模型的差异大得多,卡特雷约0.4-31%,交叉3-22%,Quemada的5-51%,10-41%权律。该研究表明,当研究了对WSS描述符的整体流动模式或平均值时,牛顿模型的假设是合理的。然而,当低Taws区域是焦点时,非牛顿模型是必要的,特别是对于具有严重狭窄的动脉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号