首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey
【24h】

The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey

机译:非洲保护区的狮子及其猎物的表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using surveys of experts associated with 186 sites across 24 countries, we assessed the effectiveness of African protected areas (PM) at conserving lions and their prey, identified factors that influence conservation effectiveness, and identified patterns in the severity of various threats. Less than one third of sampled PM conserve lions at >= 50% of their estimated carrying capacity (K), and less than half conserve lion prey species at 50% of K. Given adequate management, PAs could theoretically support up to 4x the total extant population of wild African lions (similar to 83,000), providing a measurable benchmark for future conservation efforts. The performance of PAs shows marked geographic variation, and in several countries there is a need for a significant elevation in conservation effort. Bushmeat poaching was identified as the most serious threat to both lions and to wildlife in general. The severity of threats to wildlife in PM and the performance of prey populations were best predicted by geographic-socioeconomic variables related to the size of PAs, whether people were settled within PM, human/live-stock densities in neighbouring areas and national economic indicators. However, conservation outcomes for lions were best explained by management variables. PM tended to be more effective for conserving lions and/or their prey where management budgets were higher, where photographic tourism was the primary land use, and, for prey, where fencing was present. Lions and prey fared less well relative to their estimated potential carrying capacities in poorer countries, where people were settled within PAs and where PM were used for neither photographic tourism nor trophy hunting. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:使用与24个国家的186个地点相关的专家调查,我们评估了非洲保护区(PM)在节约狮子及其猎物中的有效性,确定了影响保守效率的因素,并确定了各种威胁严重程度的模式。少于三分之一的采样PM节约狮子> = 50%的估计承载能力(k),不到50%的狮子猎物物种的50%,鉴于足够的管理,PAS可以理解最多4倍利纳野生非洲狮子群(类似于83,000),为未来的保护努力提供可衡量的基准。 PAS的表现显示了标记的地理变异,在几个国家,有必要在保护努力中进行显着高度。丛林偷猎者被认为是对狮子和野生动物的最严重的威胁。与PA的大小相关的地理社会经济变量最佳地预测对野生动物的威胁威胁的严重程度,是如何在邻近地区和国家经济指标中的下午,人类/活股密度的人民定居。但是,狮子的保护结果最能解释管理变量。 PM往往对保护狮子和/或他们的猎物更有效,管理预算更高,照片旅游是主要土地利用,而猎物,击剑的猎物。狮子和猎物相对于较贫困国家的估计潜在承载能力,人们在PAS内和PM既不用于摄影旅游也不用于奖杯狩猎。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号