...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Repellents to deter New Zealand's North Island robin Petroica australis longipes from pest control baits
【24h】

Repellents to deter New Zealand's North Island robin Petroica australis longipes from pest control baits

机译:驱动者可以阻止新西兰的北岛罗宾·普林卡宫澳大利亚澳大利亚人从害虫控制诱饵

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

North Island robins, Petroica australis longipes, are among the non-target animals at risk during poisoning operations aimed at introduced mammalian pests in New Zealand. Adding an avian repellent to the bait may reduce the risk to native birds. In this study we report on two experiments that aimed to: (1) refine a methodology for testing repellents; and (2) determine the effects of a repellent combination on bird feeding behaviour. In Experiment 1, a highly preferred base material (in which repellents could be incorporated) was identified from the choices made when robins were presented simultaneously with cereal, carrot and dough materials over 4 consecutive days on a test arena on the forest floor. Robins pecked at and ate all materials, but consistently directed more pecks at dough (P<0.001), so this material was selected for use in the subsequent study. In Experiment 2, robins were offered repellent treated (green and surface coated with a combination of cl-pulegone and Avex(TM)) and standard (green and coated with cinnamon oil; the bait formulation currently used for pest control operations in New Zealand) dough in choice tests over 4 days. The dough had either been sprayed with or dipped into the repellent combination. Robins pecked at standard dough more frequently than at repellent dough (P<0.05), with the frequency of pecking at repellent dough declining (P<0.05) over the four days. Male robins offered dipped dough pecked at the repellent dough more frequently than females. On occasions the base material was removed from the arena: standard dough removed was consumed readily but repellent-treated dough was not. The results demonstrated that the combination of d-pulegone and Avex effectively deterred robins from feeding. Green dye and cinnamon oil did not prevent feeding on cereal, carrot or dough by robins, and thus cannot be considered as effective repellents. Since cl-pulegone and Avex were effective in preventing feeding on a highly preferred base material they are likely to reduce the propensity for robins to feed on toxic possum baits. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
机译:北岛罗宾斯(北岛奥拉图州)是在旨在在新西兰引入哺乳动物的哺乳动物的中毒行动中的非目标动物之一。向诱饵添加禽兽可以降低原生鸟类的风险。在这项研究中,我们报告了旨在的两项实验:(1)优化检测驱动剂的方法; (2)确定驱虫组合对鸟类喂养行为的影响。在实验1中,从在森林地板上的测试竞技场连续4天在谷物,胡萝卜和面团材料在谷物,胡萝卜和面团材料在林地上连续4天在林地上连续4天内呈现谷物。 Robins啄食并吃了所有材料,但一致地指向面团的更多啄食(P <0.001),因此选择该材料用于随后的研究。在实验2中,Robins被提供疏口处理(绿色和表面涂有Cl-Puregone和Avex(TM)和标准(绿色并用肉桂油涂覆;目前用于新西兰的害虫控制行动的诱饵配方)在选择测试中的面团超过4天。面团已喷涂或浸入驱避剂组合中。 Robins在标准面团中掠夺而不是在驱蚊面团(P <0.05),在四天后啄食频率啄食(P <0.05)。男性知更鸟提供的浸泡面团比女性更频繁地啄在驱蚊面团。偶尔从竞技场中除去基础材料:易于消耗的标准面团,但避免了驱除治疗的面团。结果表明,D-Puregone和Avex的组合有效地阻止了Robins进料。绿色染料和肉桂油没有防止谷物,胡萝卜或面团喂养,因此不能被认为是有效的驱动剂。由于Cl-Puregone和Avex有效地防止饲喂高度优选的基础材料,因此它们可能会降低Robins以饲料含有毒性诱饵的倾向。 &复制; 2003年elestvier有限公司版权所有

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号