首页> 外文期刊>Acta clinica Croatica >VALIDATION STUDY OF THE TORONTO ALEXITHYMIA SCALE (TAS-26) IN CROATIAN POPULATION
【24h】

VALIDATION STUDY OF THE TORONTO ALEXITHYMIA SCALE (TAS-26) IN CROATIAN POPULATION

机译:克罗地亚人口多伦多无节制量表(TAS-26)的验证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to validate the Croatian translation of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-26). For this purpose, 194 volunteers from the general population, both genders, aged between 18 and 60, were tested on this scale after it had undergone a repeated back-translation procedure by an independent bilingual translator. The mean total score on TAS-26 (mean +/- SD) was 72.9 +/- 8.4. Cronbach's alpha-coefficient for the entire scale was 0.71, indicating the scale to be sufficiently reliable. When analyzing the alpha-coefficient of reliability for the entire scale, it was found that upon removal of one of the factors, only 3 factors ('I have physical sensations that even doctors don't understand'; 'When I'm upset, I don't know if I'm sad, frightened, or angry'; and 'I have feelings that I can't quite identify') would determine the a-coefficient of the entire scale amounting to less than 0.67, which would indicate insufficient reliability of the scale. The aforementioned factors belong to the group of F1 facet factors, the facet around which most items are grouped (n=12) and therefore the scale would be reliable enough even without the three factors. The results of factor analysis in our study confirmed the four-factor structure wherein most items are saturated by the first factor (n=12), and it denotes the alexithymia facet F1 (difficulty identifying feelings). Five items are saturated by the second factor and it denotes the alexithymia facet F2 (difficulty describing feelings), and the third factor which denotes facet F3 (reduced daydreaming) also saturated five items, whereas the fourth factor which denotes facet F4 (externally oriented thinking) saturated four items. The four listed facets explain 47.2% of variance wherein the highest percentage (20.1%) is attributed to facet F1, with facet F2 accounting for 12.1%, facet F3 for 7.5%, and facet F4 for 6.6% of variance.
机译:这项研究的目的是验证多伦多Alexithymia量表(TAS-26)的克罗地亚语翻译。为此,在由独立的双语翻译人员进行了反复的反向翻译程序之后,对来自年龄在18至60岁之间的年龄在18至60岁之间的这两种性别的194名志愿者进行了测试。 TAS-26的平均总分(平均值+/- SD)为72.9 +/- 8.4。整个比例的Cronbachα系数为0.71,表明该比例足够可靠。在分析整个量表的可靠性的α系数时,发现除去其中一个因素后,只有3个因素(“我有身体感觉,甚至医生也无法理解”;“当我不高兴时,我不知道自己是悲伤,害怕还是生气”;并且“我有无法完全确定的感觉”)将确定整个量表的a系数小于0.67,这表明秤的可靠性不足。前面提到的因素属于F1方面因素组,大多数项目都围绕该方面进行分组(n = 12),因此即使没有这三个因素,规模也足够可靠。在我们的研究中,因素分析的结果证实了四因素结构,其中大多数项目都被第一个因素饱和(n = 12),并且它代表了运动障碍面F1(难以识别的感觉)。第二个因素使五个项目饱和,它表示运动障碍刻面F2(难以描述感觉),第三个因素表示刻面F3(减少做白日梦)也使五个项目饱和,而第四个因素表示刻面F4(外部思维) )饱和了四个项目。列出的四个方面解释了47.2%的方差,其中最高百分比(20.1%)归因于方面F1,方面F2占12.1%,方面F3占7.5%,方面F4占6.6%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号