首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cardiologica >Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device.
【24h】

Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device.

机译:无症状和有症状的颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉支架置入和不使用远端栓塞保护装置。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of symptomatic and clinically silent embolic following carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) with and without the use of an embolic protection device (EPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and April 2009, 76 patients with carotid stenosis underwent 79 CAS procedures (three patients had bilateral CAS). In this group, 44 of the 79 procedures were performed with an EPD, and 35 were performed without an EPD. In the EPD group, 26 treated hemispheres received pre- and post-operative diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and in the non-EPD group, 16 treated hemispheres received pre- and post-operative DWI. RESULTS: All 79 procedures were technically successful without significant residual stenosis. In the EPD group, there were three symptomatic ischaemic events (6.8%), and 4 of the 26 (15.4%) treated hemispheres which received MRI showed new DWI lesions. In the non-EPD group, there was one symptomatic ischaemic event (2.9%), one mortality (2.9%) due to reperfusion injury with intracranial haemorrhage, and three of the 16 (18.8%) treated hemispheres which received MRI showed new DWL lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective analysis do not show demonstrable benefits of reducing new DWI lesions or major/minor ischaemic events after CAS with a filter protection device. Further investigations with more accurate risk-analysis strategies remain necessary in hopes of selecting patients most likely to benefit from the use of an embolic protection device.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估在有或没有使用栓塞保护装置(EPD)的情况下,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)后有症状和临床上无症状的栓塞的发生率。材料与方法:自2006年1月至2009年4月,对76例颈动脉狭窄患者进行了79例CAS手术(其中3例为双侧CAS)。在该组中,使用EPD进行了79例手术中的44例,未使用EPD进行了35例。在EPD组中,有26个接受治疗的半球在术前和术后接受了弥散加权MRI(DWI),在非EPD组中,有16个接受治疗的半球在术前和术后均接受了DWI。结果:所有79例手术均在技术上成功,无明显残余狭窄。在EPD组中,有3例症状性缺血事件(6.8%),接受MRI检查的26个半球中有4个(15.4%)显示出新的DWI病变。在非EPD组中,发生1例症状性缺血事件(2.9%),因颅内出血引起的再灌注损伤导致1例死亡(2.9%),接受MRI检查的16个半球中有3个(18.8%)出现了新的DWL病变。结论:这项回顾性分析的结果并未显示出使用滤网保护装置减少CAS后新的DWI病变或主要/次要缺血事件的明显益处。为了选择最有可能从栓塞保护装置中受益的患者,仍然需要采用更准确的风险分析策略进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号