首页> 外文期刊>BioSocieties >BRCA patients in Cuba, Greece and Germany: Comparative perspectives on public health, the state and the partial reproduction of 'neoliberal' subjects
【24h】

BRCA patients in Cuba, Greece and Germany: Comparative perspectives on public health, the state and the partial reproduction of 'neoliberal' subjects

机译:古巴,希腊和德国的BRCA患者:关于公共卫生,国家和“新手”受试者部分繁殖的比较观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relationship among genetic technologies, biosocial identity and patient subjectivity has been the focus of an increasing range of social science literature. Examining mainly European and North American contexts this work has demonstrated the variable configurations of genetic knowledge-practices and the diverse implications for at-risk individuals and populations. This article brings together ethnographic research on genomic medicine, public health and breast cancer in Cuba, Greece and Germany.Although each case study addresses different publics/patients, institutional settings and risk-related practices, they all critically examine 'neoliberal'subjectivity and BRCA patienthood, at the intersection of political rationalities, medical discourses, social conditions and moral codes. In the Cuban case, cultural articulations of inherited and other embodied risks relating to breast cancer are analysed in relation to state provision of 'community genetics', and the shifting dynamics of public health in response to global social processes. The Greek case explores how culturally embedded values, notions of inherited risk and care inform or are re-articulated through institutional practices and ambivalent subject positions, at the meeting point between individualised medicine, religious philanthropy and the particularities of public health. In the German context, diverging patient subjectivities are examined against the background of prevailing social discourses and institutionalised risk managementpractices that promote proactive individuality. Drawing on deconstructive and feminist analyses, these case studies reveal how normative 'neoliberal' patient subjects are only 'partially reproduced' in situated contexts, neither stable nor homogeneous,as different actors and publics variously articulate, embrace or engage with transnational as well as culturally embedded discourses and health practices.
机译:基因技术,生物社会身份和患者主观性之间的关系已成为越来越多的社会科学文献关注的焦点。主要考察了欧洲和北美的情况,这项工作证明了遗传知识实践的可变配置以及对处于危险中的个人和人群的不同影响。本文汇集了在古巴,希腊和德国进行的有关基因组医学,公共卫生和乳腺癌的人种学研究,尽管每个案例研究都针对不同的公众/患者,机构环境和风险相关实践,但他们都严格审查了``新自由主义''主观性和BRCA耐心,处于政治理性,医学话语,社会条件和道德准则的交汇处。以古巴为例,分析了与乳腺癌有关的遗传风险和其他隐含风险的文化表达方式,与国家提供的“社区遗传学”以及公共卫生响应全球社会进程变化的动态有关。希腊案例探讨了个体医学,宗教慈善事业和公共卫生特殊性之间的交汇点,如何通过制度实践和矛盾的主体立场来传达或体现文化底蕴的价值观,遗传风险和护理的观念。在德国的情况下,在流行的社会讨论和制度化的风险管理实践的背景下研究了多样化的患者主观性,这些实践促进了积极主动的个性化。这些案例研究借鉴了解构主义和女权主义的分析,揭示了规范的“新自由主义”患者主体是如何在不固定或同质的环境中仅“部分复制”的,因为不同的参与者和公众不同程度地表达,拥抱或参与跨国和文化活动。嵌入式话语和健康实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号