...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) prototype for the detection of pulmonary embolism.
【24h】

Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) prototype for the detection of pulmonary embolism.

机译:计算机辅助诊断(CAD)原型检测肺栓塞的临床评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a prototype computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool using artificial intelligence techniques for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) and the possible benefit for general radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty multidetector row computed tomography datasets (16/64- channel scanner) using 100 kVp, 100 mAs effective/slice, and 1-mm axial reformats in a low-frequency reconstruction kernel were evaluated. A total of 80 mL iodinated contrast material was injected at a flow rate of 5 mL/seconds. Primarily, six general radiologists marked any PE using a commercially available lung evaluation software with simultaneous, automatic processing by CAD in the background. An expert panel consisting of two chest radiologists analyzed all PE marks from the readers and CAD, also searching for additional finding primarily missed by both, forming the ground truth. RESULTS: The ground truth consisted of 212 emboli. Of these, 65 (31%) were centrally and 147 (69%) were peripherally located. The readers detected 157/212 emboli (74%) leading to a sensitivity of 97% (63/65) for central and 70% (103/147) for peripheral emboli with 9 false-positive findings. CAD detected 168/212 emboli (79%), reaching a sensitivity of 74% for central (48/65) and 82%(120/147) for peripheral emboli. A total of 154 CAD candidates were considered as false positives, yielding an average of 3.85 false positives/case. CONCLUSIONS: The CAD software showed a sensitivity comparable to that of the general radiologists, but with more false positives. CAD detection of findings incremental to the radiologists suggests benefit when used as a second reader. Future versions of CAD have the potential to further increase clinical benefit by improving sensitivity and reducing false marks.
机译:理由和目的:评估使用人工智能技术检测肺栓塞(PE)的原型计算机辅助诊断(CAD)工具的性能,以及对普通放射科医生的可能益处。材料与方法:评估了40个多探测器行计算机断层扫描数据集(16/64通道扫描仪),该数据集在低频重建内核中使用100 kVp,100 mAs有效/切片和1毫米轴向重新格式化。总共以5 mL / s的流速注入80 mL碘化造影剂。最初,六名普通放射科医生使用可商购的肺部评估软件在后台对任何PE进行标记,并同时通过CAD进行自动处理。由两名胸部放射科医生组成的专家小组分析了读者和CAD的所有PE标记,还寻找了两者均主要遗漏的其他发现,从而形成了事实真相。结果:地面真相由212个栓子组成。其中65个(31%)位于中央,而147个(69%)位于外围。读者检测到157/212栓子(74%),对中央栓子的敏感性为97%(63/65),对周围栓子的敏感性为70%(103/147),有9个假阳性结果。 CAD检测到168/212栓子(79%),中部(48/65)灵敏度为74%,外围栓子为82%(120/147)。总共154位CAD候选者被认为是假阳性,平均每例产生3.85个假阳性。结论:CAD软件显示出的灵敏度可与普通放射线医生媲美,但假阳性率更高。 CAD放射线检查结果的递增检测表明放射线医生用作第二阅读器时会受益。未来版本的CAD可能会通过提高灵敏度和减少错误标记来进一步增加临床收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号