首页> 外文期刊>Academic pediatrics >Quality improvement educational practices in pediatric residency programs: Survey of pediatric program directors
【24h】

Quality improvement educational practices in pediatric residency programs: Survey of pediatric program directors

机译:儿科住院医师项目中的质量改进教育实践:儿科项目主任调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residents to learn quality improvement (QI) methods to analyze, change, and improve their practice. Little is known about how pediatric residency programs design, implement, and evaluate QI curricula to achieve this goal. We sought to describe current QI educational practices, evaluation methods, and program director perceptions through a national survey. Methods: A survey of QI curricula was developed, pilot tested, approved by the Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD), and distributed to pediatric program directors. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: The response rate was 53% (104 of 197). Most respondents reported presence of a QI curriculum (85%, 88 of 104), including didactic sessions (83%) and resident QI projects (88%). Continuous process improvement was the most common methodology addressed (65%). The most frequent topics taught were "Making a Case for QI" (68%), "PDSA [plan-do-study-act] Cycles" (66%), and "Measurement in QI" (60%). Projects were most frequently designed to improve clinical care (90%), hospital operations (65%), and the residency (61%). Only 35% evaluated patient outcomes, and 17% had no formal evaluation. Programs had a mean of 6 faculty members (standard deviation 4.4, range 2-20) involved in teaching residents QI. Programs with more faculty involved were more likely to have had a resident submit an abstract to a professional meeting about their QI project (<5 faculty, 38%; 5-9, 64%; >9, 92%; P =.003). Barriers to teaching QI included time (66%), funding constraints (39%), and absent local QI expertise (33%). Most PPDs (65%) believed that resident input in hospital QI was important, but only 24% reported resident involvement. Critical factors for success included an experiential component (56%) and faculty with QI expertise (50%). Conclusions: QI curricular practices vary greatly across pediatric residency programs. Although pediatric residency programs commit a fair number of resources to QI education and believe that resident involvement in QI is important, fundamental QI topics are overlooked in many programs, and evaluation of existing curricula is limited. Success as perceived by pediatric program directors appears to be related to the inclusion of a QI project and the availability of faculty mentors.
机译:背景:研究生医学教育认证委员会要求居民学习质量改进(QI)方法,以分析,更改和改进其实践。儿科住院医师计划如何设计,实施和评估QI课程以实现此目标知之甚少。我们试图通过一项全国调查来描述当前的QI教育实践,评估方法和项目主管的看法。方法:制定了一项关于QI课程的调查,进行了初步测试,并得到了儿科项目主管协会(APPD)的批准,并分发给了儿科项目主管。描述性统计数据用于分析数据。结果:回应率为53%(197之104)。大多数受访者报告了存在QI课程(85%,共104个,共88个),包括教学会议(83%)和常驻QI项目(88%)。持续改进过程是最常见的方法(65%)。教授的最常见的主题是“为QI辩护”(68%),“ PDSA(计划-研究-学习-行动)周期”(66%)和“ QI的测量”(60%)。这些项目最常被设计为改善临床护理(90%),医院运营(65%)和住院医师(61%)。只有35%的患者评估了结局,而17%的患者没有进行正式评估。计划平均有6名教员(标准偏差4.4,范围2-20)参与了居民QI的教学。涉及更多教员的计划更有可能让居民向其专业人士会议提交有关其QI项目的摘要(<5教员,38%; 5-9,64%;> 9,92%; P = .003) 。 QI教学的障碍包括时间(66%),资金限制(39%)和缺少本地QI专业知识(33%)。大多数PPD(65%)认为,居民对医院QI的投入很重要,但只有24%的居民报告有居民参与。成功的关键因素包括经验成分(56%)和具有QI专业知识的教师(50%)。结论:QI课程实践在小儿住院计划中差异很大。尽管儿科住院医师计划为QI教育投入了大量资源,并认为居民参与QI很重要,但许多计划都忽略了基本的QI主题,并且对现有课程的评估受到限制。儿科项目负责人认为成功与否似乎与QI项目的纳入和教师的可获得性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号