首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Pulmonary (Q_p) to Systemic (Q_s) Flows Using 4D Phase-contrast Imaging: Pilot Study Comparison with Standard Through-plane 2D Phase-contrast Imaging
【24h】

Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Pulmonary (Q_p) to Systemic (Q_s) Flows Using 4D Phase-contrast Imaging: Pilot Study Comparison with Standard Through-plane 2D Phase-contrast Imaging

机译:使用4D相衬成像对肺(Q_p)到全身(Q_s)气流的磁共振评估:与标准直通平面2D相衬成像的试验研究比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rationale and Objectives: To investigate four-dimensionai (4D) phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) in the evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by simultaneous assessment of pulmonary (Q_P) and systemic (Qs) flows in a pilot study and to compare results to through-plane two-dimensional (2D) PC MR.Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Nineteen patients with suspected intracardiac shunts underwent cardiac MR at 1.5T. Assessments of Q_P and Q_s were performed using free-breathing retrospectively gated 2D PC gradient recalled echo (GRE; 1.6 x 1.6 x 5 mm3) imaging with one-dimensional through-plane velocity encoding gradient (v_(enc) = 150 cm/s) in consecutive measurements for the main pulmonary artery (MPA) and ascending aorta (AA), respectively. A prospectively triggered 4D PC GRE technique (2.4 x 1.8 x 3 mm3) with three orthogonal v_(enc) directions was also used with volume coverage of both MPA and AA.Results: Q_P and Q_s assessed by 4D PC correlated with 2D PC acquisitions (r = 0.92 and r = 0.67 respectively; P < .0001 for both) but demonstrated significant underestimation of individual flow volumes (-21.9 ± 12.2 ml_;P<.0001 and —10.7 + 13.1 mL; P = .0023, respectively). Calculated Q_P:Q_s ratios demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.78; P < .0001) and no significant differences between 4D PC and 2D PC acquisitions (-0.09 ± 0.24, P = .14). Image acquisition times for 2D PC assessment of Q_P and Q_s were 2.98 r 0.52 and 2.84 i 0.50 minutes, respectively (P = .038), whereas time to acquire 4D PC images was significantly longer, 18.75 + 4.58 minutes (P < .001).Conclusions: Four-dimensional PC MR imaging allows for accurate assessment of Q_P:QS ratios in the evaluation of intracardiac shunts while absolute flow volumes demonstrate offsets. Further refinement of the technique with improvement in acquisition times may be required before widespread clinical implementation.
机译:原理和目的:通过同时评估肺(Q_P)和全身(Qs)流量的一项初步研究,研究在心内分流评估中使用四维(4D)相衬(PC)磁共振(MR)的方法,以及将结果与平面二维(2D)PC MR进行比较。材料和方法:获得机构审查委员会的批准和书面知情同意。 19例疑似心脏内分流的患者在1.5T时接受了心脏MR检查。使用自由呼吸回顾性门控2D PC梯度回波(GRE; 1.6 x 1.6 x 5 mm3)成像和一维通面速度编码梯度(v_(enc)= 150 cm / s)进行Q_P和Q_s评估分别连续测量主肺动脉(MPA)和升主动脉(AA)。还使用了具有三个正交v_(enc)方向的前瞻性触发4D PC GRE技术(2.4 x 1.8 x 3 mm3),同时覆盖了MPA和AA的体积。结果:通过4D PC评估的Q_P和Q_s与2D PC采集相关( r分别为r = 0.92和r = 0.67;两者均为P <.0001),但显示出单个流量的明显低估(-21.9±12.2 mL; P <.0001和-10.7 + 13.1 mL; P = .0023)。计算得出的Q_P:Q_s比率显示出高度相关性(r = 0.78; P <.0001),在4D PC和2D PC采集之间没有显着差异(-0.09±0.24,P = .14)。用于Q_P和Q_s的2D PC评估的图像获取时间分别为2.98 r 0.52和2.84 i 0.50分钟(P = .038),而获取4D PC图像的时间明显更长,为18.75 + 4.58分钟(P <.001)结论:二维PC MR成像可在评估心脏内分流时准确评估Q_P:QS比,而绝对流量则显示出偏移。在广泛的临床实施之前,可能需要对技术进行进一步的改进以改善采集时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号