首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Coronary MR imaging: navigator echo biofeedback increases navigator efficiency--initial experience.
【24h】

Coronary MR imaging: navigator echo biofeedback increases navigator efficiency--initial experience.

机译:冠状动脉MR成像:导航仪回声生物反馈提高了导航仪效率-最初的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a respiratory biofeedback system could increase navigator efficiency and maintain image quality compared to conventional respiratory-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers underwent MRCA using three different respiratory-gating protocols. A conventional expiratory free-breathing (FB) sequence was compared to two approaches using navigator echo biofeedback (NEB), a midinspiratory approach (NEBin) and an expiratory approach (NEBex). Navigator data reflecting the position of the diaphragm relative to a 3-mm gating window were made available to the subject using a video projector in combination with a Plexiglas screen and mirror goggles. Image quality was graded by two radiologists in consensus using a visual score ranging from 1 (not visible) to 4 (excellent vessel depiction). RESULTS: The NEB approaches improved navigator efficiency (71.1% with NEBex and 68.0% with NEBin vs 42.2% with FB), thus reducing total imaging time. This difference was statistically significant (P(NEBin)=.007; P(NEBex)=.001). Image quality in the NEBex group was comparable to that in the FB group (median score, 2.44 vs 2.52), but it proved to be significantly lower (median score, 1.94 vs 2.52) for the right coronary artery and the left anterior descending coronary artery in the NEBin group. CONCLUSION: NEB maintains image quality and significantly increases navigator efficiency, thereby decreasing total imaging time by about 40% compared to a conventional FB acquisition strategy.
机译:理由和目的:这项研究的目的是研究与常规呼吸门控磁共振冠状动脉血管造影术(MRCA)相比,呼吸生物反馈系统是否可以提高导航仪效率并保持图像质量。材料与方法:18名健康志愿者使用三种不同的呼吸门控方案进行了MRCA。将传统的呼气自由呼吸(FB)序列与使用导航回声生物反馈(NEB)的两种方法,中吸气方法(NEBin)和呼气方法(NEBex)进行了比较。使用视频投影仪结合有机玻璃屏幕和镜子护目镜,可将反映隔膜相对于3毫米选通窗位置的导航器数据提供给对象。两位放射线医师对图像质量进行了分级,其视觉评分范围为1(不可见)至4(出色的血管描绘)。结果:NEB方法提高了导航器效率(NEBex为71.1%,NEBin为68.0%,FB为42.2%),从而减少了总成像时间。此差异具有统计学意义(P(NEBin)=。007; P(NEBex)=。001)。 NEBex组的图像质量与FB组相当(中位数,分别为2.44和2.52),但事实证明右冠状动脉和左前降支冠状动脉的图像质量明显较低(中位数,分别为1.94和2.52)。在NEBin组中。结论:NEB可以保持图像质量并显着提高导航器效率,从而与传统的FB采集策略相比,可将总成像时间减少约40%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号