...
首页> 外文期刊>Acoustics Australia >Comparison of Road Traffic Noise Prediction Models: CoRTN, TNM, NMPB, ASJ RTN (vol 44, pg 409, 2016)
【24h】

Comparison of Road Traffic Noise Prediction Models: CoRTN, TNM, NMPB, ASJ RTN (vol 44, pg 409, 2016)

机译:道路交通噪声预测模型的比较:CoRTN,TNM,NMPB,ASJ RTN(第44卷,第409页,2016年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This research investigates the prediction accuracy of Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CoRTN), Traffic Noise Model version 2.5 (TNM), Acoustical Society of Japan-Road Traffic Noise (ASJ RTN) and Noise Propagation Computation Method Including Meteorological Effects (NMPB). A test case model was constructed to investigate the combination of ground effect and shielding in each methodology. The predictions for CoRTN are implausible, because predicted noise levels for soft ground are equal to hard ground in some locations. This anomaly was not present in predicted noise levels from TNM, ASJ RTN and NMPB for the same test case. Noise levels for a rural freeway and an urban freeway were predicted for each methodology and compared with noise monitoring results. CoRTN resulted in high over-prediction. TNM and NMPB produced similar results, with TNM predicting slightly higher on average and NMPB having the lowest standard deviation in the prediction error. ASJ RTN resulted in high under-prediction.
机译:本研究调查了道路交通噪声计算(CoRTN),交通噪声模型版本2.5(TNM),日本声学学会道路交通噪声(ASJ RTN)和包括气象效应的噪声传播计算方法(NMPB)的预测准确性。构建了一个测试案例模型,以研究每种方法中接地效应和屏蔽的组合。对于CoRTN的预测是难以置信的,因为在某些位置,软土地的预测噪声水平等于硬土地的噪声水平。对于相同的测试案例,在来自TNM,ASJ RTN和NMPB的预测噪声级别中不存在此异常。分别针对每种方法预测了农村高速公路和城市高速公路的噪声水平,并将其与噪声监测结果进行了比较。 CoRTN导致较高的过度预测。 TNM和NMPB产生了相似的结果,TNM预测的平均值略高,而NMPB的预测误差的标准偏差最低。 ASJ RTN导致高的预测不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号